What top creators are saying about Near Protocol(NEAR)— Page 4

A contestant reported holding a temporary long position, but no catalyst, price target, or longer-term thesis was discussed.

Guests were bullish, describing NEAR's rally as a repricing of growing usage and revenue from NEAR Intents. They highlighted private-inference technology and longer-term AI potential, while noting that broader AI value accrual and proposed inflation changes remain contingent on future adoption and governance.

NEAR was named among established crypto assets receiving attention, with little individual analysis.

The speaker included NEAR among favored altcoins that could attract demand beyond Bitcoin, while providing no detailed valuation case.

The host described NEAR's technology as strong and the token as undervalued, and wanted to rebuild a larger position. Privacy-related demand was discussed as a possible theme, without a confirmed catalyst or timeline.

The speaker viewed NEAR's dip to roughly $4.80 after consolidating around $5 as a good buying spot, remained positioned in its ecosystem, and expected potential gains if the market exits its choppy period.

NEAR was named among altcoins that could attract independent investment flows, though the discussion offered little asset-specific rationale or a timeline for the target.

The discussion was strongly bullish, citing growing blockchain activity, AI products, NEAR Intents fee revenue and buybacks, and increased investor access through the NRR ETF. Investors should monitor adoption, tokenomics, and community decisions.

A speaker praised the founder but felt cash flows did not justify the valuation and questioned whether cross-chain spot trading could support it.

The speaker praised NEAR's performance and sees room to continue higher, but is not looking to buy aggressively at the current price and prefers to wait for a pullback.

Mentioned as an example of blockchain-connectivity infrastructure, with no specific investment thesis.

The guest praised founder Illia Polosukhin but doubted that cash flows justified the valuation. The host already held NEAR and had it on a buy-the-dip list.

The speaker has personally invested and sees potential for NEAR to support AI-agent payments and transactions, but the thesis is early-stage and has no price target or demonstrated adoption.

Venice uses NEAR for some trusted execution environment and encrypted inference options, a relatively small part of its overall inference activity.

Bearish after losing major support and retesting it as resistance. The speaker favors waiting for another resistance retest before entering a short rather than chasing the move.

Ranked A tier for links to privacy and AI themes, but the host's interest depends on a supportive market and recovery from an exploit. He said a move below $3 would be concerning, though he would still consider buying.

Its NEAR Intents Shield system reportedly refused more than $100 million in attempted transactions and froze about $500,000 linked to the hack. This screening may protect users but raises governance and censorship concerns; the hosts disclosed they hold or invest in NEAR.

Indicators showed deeply oversold conditions, but the speaker cautions that prices may continue declining, particularly if the broader market crashes.

The speaker remained interested in NEAR, citing the potentially popular overlap between privacy and AI, while characterizing related projects as speculative ecosystem bets.

Named among the host's favorably viewed tokens, with revenue generation and value accrual presented as preferred selection criteria.

Mentioned in the market scan in connection with intraday price moves, without a developed investment thesis.

The launch of a Bitwise NEAR ETF and reported first-day inflow equal to about 0.5% of NEAR's total supply were presented as signs of investor interest, but not proof demand will continue. The discussion also noted security and centralization trade-offs in NEAR Intents.

The speaker viewed NEAR as a short after it lost major support and appeared to retest that level as resistance, while noting event risk related to possible recovery of funds from an exploit.

Discussed favorably for transaction screening and anomaly detection that reportedly blocked suspicious activity, while noting that stronger controls may reduce permissionlessness.

Listed among crypto portfolio movers that were up.

Neuner held NEAR and cited its work on AI-agent tools as a possible advantage, while noting the use case and network winner remain uncertain.

Pal sees NEAR as a possible AI-agent platform contender, but says the competitive outcome is uncertain and should be assessed through adoption and network activity.

Listed among projects involved in the X402 ecosystem, but its transaction costs are described as relatively high compared with Solana.

The host viewed the sell-off after a $3.8 million NEAR Intents exploit as a possible buying opportunity and remained in his positions. He said the incident appeared contained and the loss was expected to be compensated, while noting operational and security risks.

The speaker noted an exploit affecting NEAR Intents and falling prices, then reported a leveraged NEAR position that was down $168.

NEAR is pivoting toward trading and payments for AI agents and was described as having demonstrated utility. A possible exploit involving NEAR Intents was mentioned but remained unconfirmed.

NEAR Intents reported an infrastructure security incident with preliminary estimated losses of about $3.8 million and temporary operational pauses. NEAR was down roughly 7.8%; the host's short trade was stopped out at a loss.

NEAR was among the cryptocurrencies with a positive move in the market snapshot, within a broadly bullish view on altcoins and perpetual futures.

Returned 190.01% in the displayed Q3 results.

NEAR Intents helped freeze roughly $500,000 in crypto routed through its swap service. The discussion praised its suspicious-flow monitoring approach but did not establish how much would be recovered or provide a price outlook.

Speakers were positive on its privacy features and relative strength but said its price had run ahead of on-chain usage and was far above its 10-week moving average, making a pullback or consolidation plausible.

NEAR had recently risen sharply, but Finn said the move appeared to occur without a clear market-wide direction.

Described as a popular asset whose strength could benefit its ecosystem. The speaker favors older NEAR ecosystem projects over new launches but cautions that selecting meme tokens requires care.

Presented as infrastructure for an agent economy, but the speaker preferred waiting for a pullback after a sharp rise.

Issa reported making about $2 million on a Near trade and said it looked like a better opportunity than Zcash at the time; another participant reportedly closed a 25x leveraged position for a $40,000 profit.

Listed as a portfolio mover; no specific investment outlook or performance details are provided.

A simulated leveraged long illustrated the difficulty of timing exits; no broader outlook or investment recommendation was offered.

Promoted in a podcast advertisement as a cross-chain interface, but the claims were promotional and no investment analysis or price target was provided.

NEAR leads PUMP over the displayed 4-hour period, gaining 117% versus 61%, but trails PUMP over the 1-hour period.

Mentioned in token commentary, and a NEAR ETF was noted as live, but no fund details or investment thesis were provided.

Used as an example of improving new-holder growth preceding a substantial price move; no current recommendation or price target is given.

The host discusses Near Intents blocking roughly $50 million in attempted flows associated with a hack, viewing the intervention as useful while raising concerns about the ability to freeze flows.

NEAR was described as roughly flat, and a NEAR exchange-traded fund was noted as having gone live; no specific recommendation was offered.

Traded by a grid bot; the strategy is long-skewed and may lose if prices continue falling without rebounding, while generally benefiting from volatility and rising or range-bound prices.

After a strong two-week run, a dip into the cited range could offer an entry; the speaker cautioned that the opportunity might not last long.