What top creators are saying about Near Protocol(NEAR)— Page 3

NEAR was mentioned as a watchlist token without a trade setup or price levels.

Appeared in brief market, portfolio, or chat updates without enough analysis to establish a lasting view.

The discussion highlighted NEAR's focus on confidential transactions, cross-chain activity, and technical leadership, while stressing that adoption and actual usage should be evaluated. The token was also among altcoins that fell about 10% before rebounding.

The host cites NEAR as having risen about 123% over the prior month, but provides no detailed thesis and does not suggest that recent gains will continue.

NEAR was used as a comparison in discussing Layer-1 positioning and valuation. No specific investment thesis or price target was provided.

Pal cited an analyst's positive view of Near's growing on-chain activity, use cases, and execution, but said he does not follow it closely or indicate that he is adding to it.

The speaker praised near.com's cross-chain trading experience as a potential ecosystem advantage, while noting that vault custody had not been confirmed.

Called a potential token of the cycle, but the speaker said its roughly 23% decline was not enough to prompt a purchase.

Viewed as a high-conviction holding based on founder execution, continued development, and potential AI-related use cases. Product adoption and practical value remain important to assess.

The host was interested in adding NEAR to spot holdings or starting a swing trade if price fell into the proposed zone, rather than chasing the market.

The chart was described as messy and vulnerable to further declines if the broader market weakened; the host identified roughly $3.20 as an area of interest in a deeper correction.

The panel highlighted NEAR's upgradeability, support for multiple signature methods including a lattice-based post-quantum option, and work on formal verification as potential resilience advantages, while noting these do not guarantee security.

NEAR was described as one of the strongest charts and strong relative to Bitcoin, though its extended rise and weekly DeMark 9 signal could precede a cooldown or correction.

NEAR was holding up better than many crypto assets, although bearish signals and a possible pullback toward $4 were noted.

The host disclosed a NEAR position up $200 but gave no broader investment outlook or recommendation.

The speaker cited a historical purchase around $1.87 on July 3 that later gained about 216%, but presented it as a past example rather than a current recommendation.

Described as strong after a large move, but the speaker preferred waiting for a deeper pullback near $3 before considering a long.

NEAR was described as part of a middle group of projects maintaining value and earning their keep; no performance figures or target were provided.

The host remained bullish and described NEAR as well positioned, while noting that a decline toward the cited level could take time to recover.

Mentioned among altcoins with ETF products and in the context of broader market access, without specific asset-level analysis.

The host has a long position that is moving against him but plans to hold because of his fundamental conviction; no specific thesis details or recovery timeline are provided.

Named among assets investors commonly owned, but no specific view or analysis was provided.

NEAR was reported down about 11%; no specific entry level or trade plan was provided.

Mentioned among protocols to evaluate under Hayes’s preference for established projects with real usage, revenue, and favorable token-holder economics. No specific valuation or entry point was provided.

Short-term bearish divergence suggests a possible pullback. A fall below $4 would make the host more bearish; the year-end level is conditional.

NEAR rose about 530% from its February lows and substantially outperformed Bitcoin, though the host gives no current valuation assessment or specific recommendation.

The host sees NEAR as a potential token of the cycle, citing its AI, quantum-resistance, privacy, and real-world-asset themes, as well as reported usage and fee-funded buybacks and burns. He recommended keeping it on a buy list and waiting for a dip rather than buying immediately.

NEAR was mentioned only in a sponsored advertisement promoting cross-chain activity and confidential transactions; the discussion provided no substantive investment analysis.

The speaker sees upside if resistance breaks but warns of bearish divergence and a possible rally trap, advising against chasing the recent rise.

The discussion is bullish on NEAR's product direction, including NEAR Intents, cross-chain asset access, privacy features, and post-quantum cryptography, while noting risks from underlying networks and uncertainty around adoption.

The host is bullish on NEAR's breakout, proposed reduction in token issuance, and potential token burns, and favors gradual buying with heavier additions near support.

Named as another token fitting the speaker's privacy-focused investment theme.

Mentioned as an asset bought through a Stonk5-related reflection mechanism and described as one of the better performers in that set. No direct holding or individual recommendation is stated.

The host holds NEAR and calls it amazing, but provides no specific price target or investment catalyst.

Classified as more of a privacy or store-of-value asset than a revenue-driven finance protocol; no specific trade setup was provided.

NEAR Intents' claimed cross-chain trading scale suggests an infrastructure opportunity, but repeated security incidents make protocol security and operational resilience central risks. No price target or buy/sell recommendation is provided.

Named among assets widely held by traders; the broader discussion warned that crowded positioning and high valuation expectations can leave popular trades exposed.

Listed among tokens commonly held by traders, but no specific thesis, catalyst, or target was discussed.

Tentatively constructive relative to other altcoins, but the potential higher low needs confirmation.

Mentioned in market commentary without a longer-term investment thesis.

A promotional segment highlighted confidential activity, post-quantum signatures, network uptime, and cross-chain transaction volume. These were presented as promotional claims rather than independent investment analysis.

The transcript calls the asset “Nia,” likely referring to NEAR Protocol. The speaker describes it as one of the more bullish tokens but is waiting for a possible entry around $3.50–$4.00, despite liquidity potentially remaining near $6.

A hack involving an associated project was discussed, but the hosts made no claim about NEAR's underlying security or token value and offered no direct investment view.

The speaker disclosed a short after NEAR lost support around $4.50, identified roughly $4.10 as possible support, and reported closing part of the position after a substantial move.

Mentioned as an example of a project attracting crypto returns or investor attention, without an asset-specific thesis.

Named among prominent market projects, but no detailed investment thesis was provided.

The host acknowledged strong fundamentals and revenue but questioned whether NEAR could become a leading blockchain and said he would not invest, preferring a stronger asset.

NEAR was described as looking relatively fine during the market selloff, without a specific target or recommendation.

NEAR was trading between nearby levels, with liquidity around $6 that could attract price. The speaker favored patience and did not make an explicit buy recommendation at that level.

NEAR Intents was presented as an approach that can refuse quotes or halt swaps involving risky activity, but the discussion did not establish its effectiveness or provide a NEAR token investment thesis.