What top creators are saying about Near Protocol(NEAR)

Discussed as a service provider for open AI models modified to remove refusal behavior. The panel noted possible cybersecurity uses as well as misuse and legal risks.

Described as weak, with the speaker expecting possible further downside before reaching a support area.

NEAR is described as spanning layer 1, AI, and privacy, themes that may attract market attention. The speaker presents it as an example rather than a buy recommendation and cautions that narrative overlap alone does not establish value.

Viewed constructively over the longer term, with potential privacy features and recovery upside, though the chart may need a further pullback.

NEAR was mentioned among coins that had recently performed well, but the speaker offered no specific target or detailed view.

The chart is weaker than HYPE and Bitcoin, trades below many major moving averages, and needs a move above roughly $4.55 to improve.

The host took a small long, citing continued privacy-narrative interest and Pump.fun integration as positive ecosystem developments.

The investment thesis links token demand to access to private AI and financial services, but the discussion provides no independent evidence of adoption or lasting token demand.

The speaker is accumulating NEAR around $3.30–$3.50 while noting it remains under resistance and could decline further.

Cited as an example of an altcoin that fell about 19% while Bitcoin declined, illustrating the risk that altcoins can drop more sharply. No specific outlook is given.

The speaker considers NEAR a second-tier cycle trade rather than a long-term conviction holding, and says a break below support would materially weaken the chart.

The host considers NEAR inexpensive after a significant correction and is looking to build a position, citing AI, privacy, and expected integrations. The proposed entry is aggressive and depends partly on Bitcoin stabilizing.

The speaker included NEAR among coins that had risen substantially since March and grouped it with projects viewed as having stronger fundamentals, but offered little project-specific analysis.

The host said NEAR would need to reach $2.90 as a condition for judging whether the crypto correction was over, rather than as a rebound target.

Reported flat, with no specific investment thesis.

A sponsor segment presented NEAR as cross-chain infrastructure, but its claims were not independently evaluated and no token valuation or buy recommendation was given.

The host plans to accumulate near an unspecified support zone using limit orders while watching for a possible trend-line breakout later in November.

Compared against XMR; no specific investment outlook or price target is provided.

Mentioned as a crypto peer for valuation comparison; no separate investment recommendation or price target is provided.

A trader reportedly gained from a 57-day NEAR long entered around $2.35 and exited around $4.25. The trade was presented as a past example, not a current opportunity.

NEAR was mentioned in connection with privacy integrations and sponsor-promoted features, but the transcript provided no token investment thesis or recommendation.

Mentioned as drawing attention for agentic commerce, but many networks are pursuing similar ideas and it is too early to identify winners or establish adoption.

The speaker added to an existing position during the decline but provided no detailed rationale beyond the pullback.

NEAR had benefited from interest in AI agents, privacy, and intent technology, but a speaker said its chart appeared to be breaking down from consolidation and could retrace if the broader market fell.

A sponsored promotion described NEAR as powering a multi-chain platform, but the discussion provided no independent assessment or investment outlook.

The investment case depends on whether NEAR Intents and NEAR.com sustain usage and convert activity into recurring fees and NEAR purchases. Reported volume and buy pressure are not independently verified, and cross-chain security remains a key risk.

The founder expressed a bullish outlook, citing product growth, reported transaction volume, and revenue-funded token buybacks. Security risks and the uncertain link between activity and sustained token demand remain important considerations.

The host said NEAR's chart looked weak and needed time to recover, while expressing longer-term interest as part of a Zcash pair trade.

The speaker considers NEAR to be in a buy zone and not directly affected by the hack, conditional on Bitcoin holding its support.

The outlook depended on support holding and price reclaiming $5; losing support would make the setup look like a failed bullish move.

Cited as an example of an altcoin making a new cycle low after Bitcoin had risen substantially, illustrating that altcoins may continue falling independently of Bitcoin.

The speaker said NEAR was trendier than Render and might respond more to near-term market activity, while noting the view was based on attention and momentum.

Described as a higher-risk growth thesis with substantial potential if it succeeds; speakers call it undervalued relative to its potential while emphasizing execution risk.

The host viewed NEAR as weak and proposed a short, later saying price had reached the identified area, though entry timing was uncertain.

The project was viewed as promising, with exposure to privacy, AI, and interoperability and activity from NEAR Intents. The speaker cautioned that price may be ahead of revenue and value returned to holders, while token inflation remains a concern.

The host liked NEAR's breakout, activity, and revenue, but questioned whether revenue and token economics justify the price and whether sufficient value accrues to holders.

Guests cited cross-chain trading, privacy features, reduced emissions, and potential buybacks, while noting emissions still exceeded revenue and buybacks.

Mentioned as a market-price update without a developed investment thesis.

The host described NEAR as one of the stronger-looking assets among the charts reviewed, without providing a price target or fundamental analysis.

The speaker holds NEAR and plans to sell 5% of the position at each of the 2x and 3x entry levels, directing proceeds to cash. He favors staged profit-taking while retaining 10%–20% for further upside.

NEAR was described as a popular AI-related token that had already risen roughly four to five times from its low, making less-popular tokens seem to offer more upside from current levels.

Mentioned as a token available in a sponsored trading competition, without a specific investment thesis or price target. It could benefit from a broader altcoin recovery if Bitcoin rises, but no separate forecast is made.

A sponsored segment promoted Near.com as a multi-chain interface for trading, payments, tokenized assets, and yield. The claims were promotional, with no price outlook or recommendation for NEAR.

NEAR was cited as having gained 203% over an unspecified period, but the speaker described it as illiquid.

Mentioned as a coin the speaker is not buying on the expectation that it will defy market cycles; potential upside is framed as dependent on a Bitcoin-led rally.

The speaker considered a further correction toward the 55-day moving average likely if the two-day corrective setup continued, while noting that the pattern was not guaranteed.

The host held NEAR and viewed a dip below $4.50 as a possible entry, while expecting further downside could occur before a bottom formed.

Mentioned in a podcast advertisement promoting NEAR.com’s cross-chain trading, payments, and yield platform. No valuation, price target, or investment recommendation is provided.

The speaker was slightly bearish on NEAR in the short term despite its prior strength; no entry, target, or stop-loss was provided.

NEAR broke an upward-sloping channel and reached an initial retracement target; prospects partly depend on the broader market turning risk-on.