What top creators are saying about Opendoor Technologies Inc.(OPEN)— Page 2

The speaker is bearish, calling it a 'terrible, terrible business model' and a 'flawed business' that is not a viable long-term holding.

Positioned at the forefront of the real estate tokenization trend by being one of the first major platforms to begin accepting Bitcoin for home purchases.

The market misunderstands Opendoor as a house flipper; it's a software company building a marketplace similar to Amazon's early days. It is considered a high-risk, high-reward turnaround play under new leadership focused on the original marketplace vision.

Stock rose 15% on news that it will begin accepting Bitcoin and other cryptos as payment for homes, a move seen as innovative.

Identified as a stock to avoid due to a speculative run-up of over 1000% that appears disconnected from its underlying business, which has thin margins and has never reported a full year of profit.

Mentioned unfavorably due to its capital-intensive model, which is considered less preferable than the asset-light approach of competitors like The Real Brokerage.

Described as having a 'deeply flawed' and unprofitable business model, with its recent stock surge attributed to unsustainable 'meme stock' dynamics rather than fundamentals.

A major quantitative trading firm, Jane Street, is reportedly 'not bullish' on the stock, which is viewed as a negative data point, although the insight is limited.

Highlighted as a stock to watch in the housing sector that rebounded on positive housing data, but its ability to achieve profitability is the key question for its future.

Viewed unfavorably as a capital-intensive disruptor compared to The Real Brokerage (REAX). The speaker notes a lack of anecdotal presence.

Showing strong positive momentum due to two catalysts: strong new home sales data and a new 5.9% stake taken by institutional investor Jane Street.

The stock is highly sensitive to housing data, surging on strong sales numbers. However, its core challenge remains its business model and unproven path to profitability.

Mentioned as an example of a highly shorted stock experiencing a massive rally, part of a 'wild mania' which the speaker believes is at or near its peak ('Top is in').

The host is hyperbolically bullish, citing a potential 'Mother of All Squeezes' (moas) and a sarcastic '$1,000 a share' target. This reflects a speculative, volatility-based trading idea, not a fundamental investment.

Showing bullish signs and hitting new 52-week highs, driven by potential rate cuts boosting transaction volumes. The new CEO's direct communication strategy is seen as a positive, and management is believed to have a strong plan to improve margins and turn the company around.

The speaker has initiated a valuation-based short position, citing a challenging housing market and the company's weak guidance. He suggests scaling into the short at higher prices like $15 or $20.

A very high-risk, high-reward speculative investment championed by Eric Jackson as the 'next Carvana.' The bull case relies on lack of competition and future interest rate cuts, but current fundamentals are weak and the host expresses caution.

A speaker expressed a clear bearish sentiment, stating, 'I'd short open you,' indicating a potential short-selling opportunity.

A high-risk, story-driven stock based on belief in new leadership. The speaker is skeptical of the business model and is not investing, viewing it as a speculative play.

Surged 76% in a single day, suggesting potential volatility or specific catalysts that warrant further investigation.

Surged 75%, suggesting investors are positioning for a more dovish Fed.

Highlighted as a prime example of 'speculative froth' after surging 64% in one day. The move is viewed as detached from fundamentals and a warning sign of increasing speculation in the market.

Key fundamental hurdle is its inability to generate profit margins, which lower rates won't fix. Activist investor Martin Shkreli called it an 'obvious short'.

The company's reported positive cash flow is considered 'fake' as it comes from liquidating inventory, not profitable operations. The speaker views the stock as a 'zero' and recommends shorting it due to a flawed business model and history of unprofitability.

The interim CEO purchased $128,000 worth of stock, which is a mildly positive sign, though the small amount suggests it could be a strategic move to generate positive sentiment rather than a signal of a major catalyst.

Viewed as a speculative 'gamble' driven by retail sentiment. The stock rose despite the former CEO selling $35 million in shares, suggesting market optimism about new management.

Stock was up 14% on a down day for the market, suggesting strong underlying momentum despite news of the former CEO filing to sell a large block of shares.

The host expressed strong skepticism about the business model's profitability, though noted the stock was surprisingly up 7% on a red market day.

Insider activity is 'super bullish,' with the CEO buying shares and the entire executive team halting pre-scheduled stock sales, signaling strong confidence.

The entire executive team canceling their pre-scheduled stock selling plans is viewed as an 'undeniably bullish signal' and a massive vote of confidence in the company's future.

The speaker is cautious due to a recent 10x price increase, making it 'scary' and at high risk of a significant correction. Its business model is more dependent on rising home prices, making it a riskier bet than REAX.

Described as a high-risk, sentiment-driven 'meme stock' trade with extreme volatility. The price action is based on social media hype, not fundamentals, with a community-driven target of $82.

Considered a very high-risk, speculative trade. The recent stock surge is seen as driven by 'pure retail momentum' and not by strong underlying business fundamentals.

Considered a high-risk, speculative 'meme stock' driven by hype rather than business fundamentals. The speaker believes buying it is 'gambling' and would not touch it.

The post speculates on the stock potentially reaching a price target of $82, which suggests a bullish outlook.

The speaker is avoiding the stock, viewing it as overbought. There are also concerns about the company's leadership focusing on profits over growth.

Considered a high-risk, speculative play on interest rates. While the host is wary of hype (citing a $500 target as 'froth'), it's a clear beneficiary of a dovish Fed, rallying over 20%.

Mentioned in the context of Robinhood's CEO strategically engaging with the Opendoor retail trading community, with no direct investment thesis provided for Opendoor itself.

Described as the 'biggest meme stock on the planet right now.' The host does not believe in the investment thesis but acknowledges the massive community and trading volume.

High trading activity and options volume in the stock, particularly on Robinhood's platform, are expected to boost Robinhood's transaction revenue.

Cited as an example of a poorly performing SPAC from Chamath Palihapitiya that is down significantly and hurt many retail investors. High options trading volume on the stock is seen as a tailwind for Robinhood, not Opendoor itself.

Cited as one of the sponsor's previous SPACs that is down over 50% lifetime, serving as a cautionary example.

The stock is experiencing extreme volatility driven by a retail-hyped bull thesis about an AI-powered, asset-light model. The host is highly critical, suggesting the thesis lacks substance and faces challenges from established competitors like Zillow.

Mentioned as one of Chamath Palihapitiya's previous SPACs that is down over 50% historically, which suggests caution.

The stock was up 7% after news that the CEO is stepping down, which the market appears to be interpreting as a bullish development.

The stock surged on news of the CEO stepping down, which could restore investor confidence. Legendary investor Paul Tudor Jones also disclosed a new stake, making it a speculative situation to watch.

Described as a 'bad business,' management guided revenue significantly lower for the next quarter due to a poor housing environment, causing the stock to fall over 20%.

Extremely bearish sentiment due to criticism of its CEO, weak fundamentals, and the view that retail hype around it is a 'pump with no substance'.

The company was mentioned as an example of a business model that was hurt by rising interest rates, contrasting with REAX's asset-light advantage.

Fell 25% in after-hours trading, indicating potential short-term volatility or negative news.