What top creators are saying about Opendoor Technologies Inc.(OPEN)

Appeared in a performance screen as having fallen about 67%; the screen was not a fundamental review or recommendation.

Opendoor narrowly missed revenue expectations and reported a larger-than-expected per-share loss, despite shares rising after hours.

Shares rose alongside housing stocks as investors anticipated lower inflation and interest rates.

Cited as a steep year-to-date decliner, down approximately 67%; the discussion emphasized that a large decline warrants research rather than automatic investment conclusions.

Less preferred than RKT or NVR as an investment tied to the housing industry.

Cited as a sharp decliner in a performance-screen example, with no company-specific investment analysis.

The post criticizes the CEO and a new board member for lacking housing-industry experience and claims the company is trying to become a meme stock.

Described as a speculative position that could outperform over the next five or more years, with the risk of losing the entire investment.

The author sees potential to outperform over the next five or more years but describes the investment as speculative and warns investors could lose 100% of their investment.

The author characterizes Opendoor's offers to sellers in financial need as poor and views the company as predatory, while inviting others to challenge that assessment.

The post criticizes management and says shareholders are down 85% since Kaz Nejatian became CEO. It suggests the company could be acquired for its data by Zillow or Redfin and cautions against assuming it will replicate Shopify's success.

Shareholders are down 85% since @nejatian became CEO, indicating a strongly negative assessment of the stock's performance.

Jackson said Opendoor had been unfairly punished and that patient investors could be rewarded over time. He praised its CEO but noted pressure from higher long-term interest rates and the risk of mistiming an investment.

Shares rose as Treasury yields fell, with the discussion suggesting lower rates could benefit housing-related companies. No company-specific investment thesis was provided.

Shares closed at $1.99, down 5.69%, and traded at $1.98 after hours. The chart shows a steep five-year decline; the post claimed there was zero chance of reaching $2 per share, though reader context notes the stock hit $2.

Opendoor was grouped with speculative, memeable stocks whose prices may be driven by social-media attention rather than fundamentals; the speakers cautioned against chasing rallies.

Mentioned as a comparison that the host found less attractive than Zillow, without a detailed company analysis.

The stock was described as down 75% from a prior level near $10 and 63% over a year. Severe pessimism may create opportunity, but high rates and weak housing conditions remain risks and there is no evidence the decline has ended.

Operates under overarching real estate bear market pressures and shares the same macro risk profile as Zillow.

Crashed due to the real estate market decline; recovery is entirely dependent on a housing market rebound.

Winding down international operations to reshore work to the U.S. using AI-native teams to handle workflows.

The analyst is no longer following it closely, suggesting it has been 'taken over by hype' compared to REAX.

Speculative bullish play if they can unfreeze the market with 4.99% mortgage rates.

Recommended as a short position due to its money-losing business model, a valuation inflated by misleading revenue accounting, and a lack of institutional ownership.

Stock was up 16% in pre-market after beating revenue expectations and providing bullish guidance for achieving profitability by fiscal year 2026.

The market is reacting positively to guidance of achieving GAAP profitability by 2026, overshadowing a massive EPS miss. The revenue beat signals successful home sales, but it's viewed as a high-risk, high-reward stock.

A high-conviction, mission-driven investment based on the belief that solving a major societal problem like housing affordability will generate strong long-term economic returns.

Mentioned in the context of retail investor influence, about which host Steve Eisman is 'very skeptical.'

Considered a 'major beneficiary' of Trump's housing proposals, but the host questions the sustainability of the rally given the company's lack of profitability.

The stock 'took a hit' following political comments about stopping institutional investors from purchasing single-family homes.

Mentioned in a bearish context as a competitor to REAX with an inferior, more 'capital heavy' business model that involves flipping houses.

The iBuying business model is described as high-risk and low-margin, operating on thin spreads ('basis points') and exposed to significant financial risk. It is considered a fundamentally challenging and capital-intensive business despite its sophisticated technology.

The stock was up over 9% on the news that billionaire investor David Shaw took a 6.4% stake in the company, which is seen as a strong positive catalyst.

While it was noted that a billionaire took a large stake, the speaker issued a caution against blindly following such moves, suggesting it could be a short-term trade and implying risk for retail investors.

Stock was up over 10% on the news that the CEO purchased $1 million worth of stock, a strong signal of insider confidence.

The company is in a strategic turnaround under a new CEO whose compensation is tied to stock performance. A new 'Peace of Mind Guarantee' product is a key differentiator, and policies like the 50-year mortgage are seen as a major tailwind.

The stock surged after receiving a JP Morgan upgrade to an $8 price target, which was reinforced by a strong insider signal of the CEO's family buying $1 million of stock.

Despite what was described as weak earnings, the stock recovered significantly after announcing a $1.1 billion stock offering.

Stock was down 23% after a disappointing earnings report where it missed EPS estimates by 71%. The core iBuying business model is struggling and being questioned by the market, making it a high-risk investment.

Slightly bearish, as the speaker has previously shorted the stock and, while acknowledging the CEO is good, questions if the company's valuation is justified.

Reported a massive EPS miss and a 34% year-over-year revenue decline, highlighting severe struggles in the current housing market. A post-earnings direct offering adds to dilution and cash-need concerns.

Bearish sentiment; the stock is associated with a portfolio of high-risk, money-losing companies that the speaker believes are 'going to zero'.

Saw strong upticks above 3.8% and is considered a mover for continued short-term momentum.

Used as an example when advising a friend on how to learn to short, recommending a '1% position, something that can't hurt you' to learn the mechanics.

The speaker successfully shorted the stock, believing its poor business fundamentals would ultimately cause the price to fall, regardless of its 'meme stock' popularity.

Viewed as a significant turnaround story, with the potential for 10X value creation as new leadership unwinds past strategic mistakes in cost structure and technology investment.

The speaker has a negative view, calling the company 'so sad' and a 'flash in the pan.'

A top holding in the Roundhill MEME ETF at 11.94%.

A top holding in the new Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME), which could lead to higher volatility and liquidity from fund flows.

A top holding (11.94%) in the new Roundhill MEME ETF.