What top creators are saying about Intel Corporation(INTC)— Page 2

Described as losing about a third of its value in roughly an hour after previously being valued at around $500 billion, highlighting the risk of sudden shocks in individual stocks.

Intel’s decline of more than 20% contributed to volatility in semiconductor and AI trades; the speaker offered no direct recommendation.

The speaker was strongly bearish, criticizing Intel's execution and fab plans, weak guidance, pressure on its PC business, and expensive valuation. Potential AI benefits were described as conditional on improved execution.

Shares reportedly fell roughly 28–30% after a below-expectations outlook despite results beating estimates. PC demand, memory costs, geopolitical disruption, and execution remain risks, although domestic manufacturing capacity may have strategic value.

Intel shares fell sharply after a weaker-than-expected outlook despite beating earnings estimates. Expensive memory chips weighed on PC sales, while geopolitical disruption at its Israel fab was also cited.

The speaker sees Intel as the least compelling stock discussed, citing a high valuation, declining PC sales, competitive pressure from AMD and Nvidia, and volatile trading.

Intel was cited as having fallen about 25%, with pressure attributed partly to weak PC sales and higher memory costs. The decline was not viewed as proof that AI infrastructure demand had disappeared; no specific recommendation was given.

Shares fell 28% that day, illustrating sector weakness. The speakers were cautious about cyclical semiconductor demand and said the buying point had not yet arrived.

Intel's sharp after-hours decline was cited as a sign that earnings expectations and AI-related spending were under scrutiny.

Shares fell about 30% in one day and 27% over five days after a disappointing earnings call, with investors concerned about losses and execution. The potential opportunity depends on converting fab investment and hyperscaler interest into stronger results.

Mentioned only as an example of a stock that performed worse during the selloff; no company-specific analysis or recommendation was provided.

Disappointing earnings were cited as contributing to concerns about technology companies' heavy AI spending; no company-specific guidance or recommendation was provided.

Intel fell sharply, with the discussion highlighting negative reactions to its earnings call and doubts about execution in manufacturing despite earlier optimism about government backing and prospective hyperscaler customers.

Despite higher reported earnings, weak forward revenue and EPS guidance, a persistent PC slump, and data-center supply-chain problems weighed on the outlook.

Disappointing earnings and concerns about PC demand, memory pressures, and data-center growth led the speakers to view the stock as rationally repriced.

Negative news around earnings is cited.

Data-center and foundry revenue grew, but foundry losses, a weaker outlook, and forecast pressure on margins highlight significant execution and profitability risks.

Intel fell more than 30% and reached the host's $65 corrective level. A bounce was possible, but the longer-term chart was described as poor and a rebound would not confirm a reversal.

After a roughly 30% one-day decline following an earnings miss, the host said a long-term purchase could make sense but warned that a broader market downturn could prolong recovery.

The speaker was strongly bearish, citing weak fourth-quarter revenue guidance, slowing growth, execution risks in Intel's fab plans, and uncertainty over whether AI demand will translate into revenue and margins. The speaker said Intel could still be worth buying if AI becomes a genuine tailwind and the company executes.

Shares are at $64.49, down 32.49% on the displayed 3-day candle.

Trades at a blended price-to-sales ratio near 10 versus a historical ratio around 3; a return to that level could imply a decline from about $117.05 to $36.32, with an estimated annual return of -36.87%.

The post predicts a huge earnings beat but expresses fear and provides no further investment details.

The speaker criticized Intel's disappointing results, weak growth, execution, and management, viewing it as a high-risk turnaround. The $20 figure was a downside concern, not a formal price target.

An order-related issue and 22% figure are mentioned, but the garbled context does not establish a reliable outlook.

The host had bought Intel but described its fundamentals as looking 'a bit wrecked'; the cited levels were watch areas rather than a confirmed long-term valuation case.

The near-term outlook is bearish as high memory prices weigh on PC demand, weakness may persist through the first half of next year, and the company faces lower gross margins and supply constraints.

Intel was reported down roughly 30% during the session and was noted as having missed earnings; no separate investment thesis was developed.

Despite missed revenue forecasts and a punished stock price, the host viewed around $68 as a possible buying opportunity and said he entered near $68.91 using 10× leverage, a high-risk approach.

Intel was said to be down almost 24% overnight after filling a gap. The speaker identified about $47 as a possible support area in a continued decline.

The stock was down about 23% after hours, illustrating stress and potential for large short-term moves in technology stocks; no company-specific investment case was offered.

The post's earnings prediction for INTC was wrong.

Intel was described as down 25% to around 30% at points in the stream. The remarks were incidental and did not provide a stock-specific investment thesis.

Shares reportedly fell 19% after hours following earnings, but the discussion offered no details to assess the decline or the company's outlook.

Predicted to deliver a huge earnings beat, though the stock is down sharply after hours.

A weaker-than-expected Q4 outlook and lower gross-margin expectations weigh on the near-term outlook; foundry progress could support the longer-term story if customer commitments become realized revenue.

Predicted to beat earnings.

The speaker saw potential for a short-term rebound while identifying $81–$82 as the important level for preserving the broader higher-low structure. He disclosed owning Intel.

Intel was mentioned among companies reporting earnings, but no company-specific investment thesis or figures were provided.

Upcoming earnings could test whether CPU demand is improving; strong guidance might support the shares, while results could also disappoint.

Mentioned as an upcoming or same-day earnings event to watch; no investment analysis or recommendation was provided.

One speaker added to an Intel position during a pullback, viewing the sell-off and rebound as an example of shifting market sentiment.

One host added to their Intel position after a pullback, viewing the decline as part of broader de-risking ahead of Anthropic’s S-1 filing and the midterms.

Shares gained 1.83%; the measurement period is unspecified.

The stock was bouncing from its 200 EMA, with $110 mentioned as a possible rally area.

HSBC maintains a Buy rating, citing improving foundry engagement and server CPU strength; the report cites a share price of $90.47 and 121.1% upside to the target.

The post predicts Intel will outperform everything.

Intel was named among the stocks strong during a session in which semiconductor shares rallied despite AI-related cybersecurity concerns.

Intel is attempting to form a base; the speaker wants further recovery or a move above resistance before calling the base successful.

Mentioned as an upcoming earnings report; no company-specific forecast or investment recommendation was provided.