What top creators are saying about Pepe(PEPE)

Had a small bounce, but the broader assessment of meme coins was cautious and warned of prolonged weakness.

Mentioned as a comparison for USELESS's potential this cycle.

Named as an asset against which USELESS gained; no independent investment outlook is provided.

Mentioned as a comparison for the kind of cycle runner USELESS could become.

Included in a broad comment that altcoins looked strong while Bitcoin appeared strong, without individual analysis or a specific catalyst.

USELESS showed relative strength against PEPE in the screenshots.

The host favors Dogecoin over Pepe, citing the risk that newer or smaller meme coins can be displaced or lose attention.

Used as an example of a speculative coin that can lose substantial value. The host characterizes this investing category as unpredictable and suggests considering profit-taking after large gains.

Pepe was mentioned among altcoins in a generally cautious discussion, with no specific price target or recommendation.

Mentioned only in a list of coins, with no specific assessment or recommendation.

Reached a $1 billion market cap 169 days after the cycle low, when Bitcoin was up 86%; cited as an example of meme runners emerging after Bitcoin's new all-time highs.

Pepe was reportedly among the tokens moved in the incident and was not falling as sharply as the speakers expected, but they did not make a specific investment case.

Mentioned uncertainly in connection with an alleged attempt to sell or withdraw crypto; no specific investment thesis or recommendation was provided.

The speaker says the affected tokens had already been sold and were beginning to recover, with Binance buybacks potentially offsetting selling pressure; they see little case for shorting PEPE after the initial sell-off.

PEPE was rising while much of the market was down, with attention attributed to reported buying activity. The host said the situation was unclear and recommended waiting for consolidation.

Its sharp drop and rebound during the Binance incident illustrated extreme volatility and trading risk; no fundamental investment case was presented.

The speaker sees potential upside after a rebound but is cautious about meme coins and their volatility.

Mentioned as one of Coinbase's top three most-traded memecoins; no asset-specific outlook or price target was provided.

A report said the suspected attacker held and began selling PEPE, which was reported down about 11%; the host noted potential short-term volatility and provided no fundamental investment case.

Has shown strength when Bitcoin rises and is expected to draw attention in the coming weeks and months; it is up 14% from its yearly open.

The host described a possible long only after a low sweep but generally disliked trading PEPE and was cautious.

Mentioned in market-price updates without a developed individual investment thesis.

The author expects USELESS to catch up with and strongly outperform PEPE; the quoted post says PEPE is up 14% from its yearly open and has lagged USELESS by more than 10× this year.

The speaker included PEPE among altcoins viewed broadly positively, while noting that altcoins could fall further if Bitcoin declines toward $75,000.

Mentioned as a comparison for Useless Coin; no specific investment outlook for Pepe is provided.

PEPE is expected to be caught up to and outperformed by USELESS; displayed snapshots show PEPE up 6.2–14.4%.

Mentioned as a meme coin receiving less attention than before, amid caution about speculative demand and sharp losses.

A speaker called a short after a possible top, but no entry or target was provided.

PEPE is expected to be outperformed by USELESS, despite a 14% gain year to date and a 14.37% rise in one displayed snapshot.

Reportedly up 14% from its yearly open, with early-year gains cited at 50%; the image shows PEPEUSDT up 4.85%, though it is presented as underperforming USELESS.

The host describes PEPE as having little value beyond popularity and the hope that later buyers will pay more, and cautions against judging cheapness by unit price.

Shown among memecoins with positive displayed gains, but no specific investment analysis or recommendation is provided.

Named as an example of the meme-coin theme, not as a specific buy recommendation.

Mentioned as an asset on which the author reports past trading gains and its market-cap peak; no further outlook is given.

The host cited a prior market-cap peak of about $12 billion and argued that meme coins should be limited to speculative or gambling-sized positions.

Cited as an example of a token that had outperformed Bitcoin during the period shown; no specific recommendation or target was given.

Its current strength is cited as support for a bullish view on USELESS.

Mentioned as a comparison to Bonk's cycle-runner behavior.

The host thinks meme coins such as PEPE may be less attractive as investors seek projects with more utility, while acknowledging that meme coins may still rally.

Mentioned as a past cycle-defining memecoin that USELESS could emulate; no separate investment outlook is given.

Mentioned as a comparison for the type of runner Useless Coin could become; no specific investment outlook for Pepe is given.

Cited as an example of a speculative meme coin whose surges may be short-lived and which may not be attractive as a long-term investment.

The speaker said Pepe remained bearish and could fall another 10%–20%.

PEPE passed a $1B market cap when Bitcoin was around $28,000–$30,000.

Mentioned in market commentary without a longer-term investment thesis.

The speaker said PEPE appeared to have formed a durable bottom, but that view could change if Bitcoin made new lows. He characterized meme coins as speculative, shorter-term holdings.

Listed as an example of an animal-themed meme narrative; no specific recommendation, valuation, or price target is provided.

Mentioned as a comparison for USELESS's potential as a cycle runner.

Described as a possible ETH-related trade that could benefit if Ethereum gains momentum; it is a higher-risk, sentiment-sensitive asset without a fundamental valuation case.

Mentioned in market updates, portfolio descriptions, or trader-position summaries without a specific target or detailed investment thesis.