What top creators are saying about Hyperliquid(HYPE)— Page 6

The speaker was strongly positive on Hyperliquid's revenue-generating business and longer-term outlook. A planned Kraken integration could drive fees that benefit HYPE through buybacks and burns, although the chart had weakened below its megatrend and 10-week moving average.

The speaker preferred HYPE over the short-to-medium term but said a fall below $75.25 would imply a much more severe decline.

The speaker described Hyperliquid as a strong performer earlier in the year and said they had held it from lower levels, but were avoiding it at the time of recording.

Bullish arguments cited product breadth across perps, spot trading, stablecoins, lending, and outcomes, with potential options activity and revenue capture. Risks include historically elevated valuation multiples, popularity, and uncertainty around circulating versus future supply.

Described as remaining in an uptrend; holding about $75 was important, while a drop below could lead to a test of an untested daily fair-value gap.

Mentioned briefly as an example of a crypto asset advisers might encounter; no investment merits, products, or risks were discussed.

Hyperliquid currently has the largest share of its market, but the guest expects greater competition and regulation. He cautioned against treating token buybacks as a substitute for investment in growth and technology.

Reported $2.36 million in 24-hour revenue, below Papertrade's revenue that day.

Cited as an example of a platform that can still work out for users who join after its launch.

Hyperliquid fell about 13% over seven days but rose roughly 2% over 30 days. It was described as earning its keep relative to market value, with fees and activity worth monitoring.

Mentioned as an example of sentiment changing from previously bullish to bearish; the reported concerns concerned the broader AI trade rather than Hyperliquid fundamentals.

The speaker is bullish, citing on-chain trading growth, lower costs, trading bots, market-share gains, and token burns. His commercial connection to a related service is a potential conflict of interest.

Mentioned only as a cryptocurrency available to trade on Kalshi; no individual outlook or investment thesis is provided.

Viewed as the leading on-chain perpetual-futures product, with strong design, user experience, and team. Long-term upside depends increasingly on adoption beyond crypto, including integrations and access to traditional-finance traders.

A guest expressed a long-term positive view of the project, citing its product and founder, conditional on continued execution. U.S. regulatory uncertainty around prediction markets was noted as a risk.

Mentioned among protocols to evaluate under Hayes’s preference for established projects with real usage, revenue, and favorable token-holder economics. No specific valuation or entry point was provided.

The speaker called Hyperliquid a standout coin but described severe crash-era losses, including a decline from about $45 to $20 and an 88.5% worst intraday drawdown. Leverage amplified losses for traders whose old bids were filled and liquidated.

The post argues Hyperliquid should reduce spot-trading fees to zero to become the cheapest onchain venue, citing stagnating spot volumes as a growth concern.

Cited as an example of a coin to trade based on whether it currently makes sense, without emotional attachment; no specific price target or directional view is given.

Named as a coin to consider trading based on its attractiveness at the time; exit if it no longer makes sense.

The host said HYPE had outperformed Bitcoin overall but expected it to give back some relative strength in the short to medium term.

The speaker is strongly bullish, citing token burns, limited supply, and platform features, and believes HYPE may outperform Bitcoin and Ethereum; his platform use and promotional ties are important conflicts to consider.

The host cites about $2 million in revenue in the last day and trading-bot profits, but cautions that entering after a large rally can be risky.

Hyperliquid was mentioned as infrastructure for private perpetual trading integrated with NEAR and as an audience-suggested token of the cycle. The host offered no separate investment thesis or price target.

The speaker said Hyperliquid remained bearish for now and could fall another 10%–20%.

Mentioned in passing without substantive investment analysis or a price target.

Mentioned as a possible position users might eventually borrow against through Aave and NEAR.com, without assessment of fundamentals or investment prospects.

Cited as one of the few crypto businesses that have significantly outperformed.

Mentioned among projects represented at the conference, with no specific investment case discussed.

The speaker describes dollar-cost averaging into it and treats it as a longer-term holding that can accommodate larger trades than smaller-cap tokens.

The host sees value in network effects and platform activity, but warns that complex strategies tied to token incentives can be risky.

A buyer spent 500 HYPE, valued at $41,925, to purchase PSTR.

The host strongly wants to own HYPE and cites trading revenue, token burns, ecosystem growth, and product usability. He believes it could reach $500 over time but does not provide a timeline.

The host was bullish, citing product-market fit and a Kraken partnership that could broaden U.S. access to perpetual trading. He named HYPE as his preferred asset to buy over time but gave no price target and acknowledged valuation and regulatory risks.

Presented as a major revenue-oriented on-chain trading platform and valuation benchmark for Derive, while also developing options-like products that could compete with it.

Mentioned in connection with Donald Trump's comments, but the transcript provides no price, target, or investment recommendation.

Its core perpetuals product was praised, but speakers considered the asset expensive, crowded, and priced for substantial future revenue. HIP-4 had limited traction so far.

Speakers praised its perpetuals product but considered the valuation expensive and potentially reflective of substantial future revenue. New products could support growth, though their traction is uncertain.

A stronger-performing altcoin that has corrected sharply; outlook depends on whether support holds.

The HYPE options market has helped bring users and trading volume to Derive; no direct investment view on the token was expressed.

Options on HYPE reportedly helped bring users and volume to Derive. This is market-activity context, not a token recommendation.

Included in a basket tied to crypto and tokenization, a long-term investment theme with adoption and regulatory hurdles.

The speaker called it arguably one of crypto's strongest coins, but highlighted its sharp crash-period drawdown as evidence that conviction does not eliminate liquidity risk.

The speaker is bullish on Hyperliquid as a strong perp-trading business, citing institutional visibility, relative resilience across market cycles, and its deep order book. The thesis centers on growth in the perp market rather than a specific token valuation.

Named as a venue used by perpetuals traders; no assessment of its token, platform risk, fees, or investment merits is provided.

The speaker is waiting for a price range around $70–$74 before considering an entry.

The speaker holds HYPE and sees Hyperliquid as established in the perpetual decentralized exchange niche, with an ambitious longer-term vision to host broader financial activity.

Named as an example of the speculative-trading ecosystem. The discussion warns that automation and competition could make short-term trading harder; it does not assess the asset's business or valuation.

The speaker named Hyperliquid among assets he considers more durable over the long term, in contrast with shorter-term speculative tokens.

Viewed positively for liquidity-driven network effects and expanding asset coverage, including around-the-clock oil trading. Sustained liquidity and growth beyond crypto-native assets remain key questions.