What top creators are saying about Hyperliquid(HYPE)— Page 5

Listed as a blue-chip crypto token and described as generating $68 million over 30 days, though the transcript does not clarify the measure. The speaker recommends comparing valuation with revenue and assessing its trend; revenue does not guarantee token-holder value.

HYPE was down about 20% from recent highs amid broad crypto-market declines; no specific view on its prospects or valuation was offered.

Named among networks that may be moving ahead of XRP in the broader competition, with no detailed performance comparison or investment recommendation.

Relatively strong against Bitcoin, with a possible short-term decline followed by a higher low. A sustained break below support could signal a larger reversal.

The host might consider buying again near $60, presenting it as a conditional watchlist idea rather than an immediate recommendation.

Described as the biggest opportunity in crypto, with users expected to be rewarded massively.

The speaker cites Hyperliquid as a precedent for attracting users through wallet-based, no-KYC access and a prominent native token, not as a direct buy recommendation.

The host cited Hyperliquid as a protocol attracting attention through returns or value directed to token holders, favoring crypto projects with adoption and value-accrual mechanisms.

Named among the fund's larger positions, but no individual valuation case or price target was provided.

Named as one of the firm's larger crypto positions, with no further thesis, target, or risk assessment provided.

Previous highs have repeatedly turned into support. The speaker is watching $70–$75, about 25% below previous highs, and expects longer-term growth.

The speaker identified $75 as an important tested level and preferred waiting for the hourly downtrend to break and lower highs to be taken out before considering a reversal.

Cited as evidence of demand for on-chain derivatives, but not as a direct recommendation or forecast for its token.

The speaker uses Hyperliquid for an AI trading bot and is considering buying HYPE. He sees trading-fee discounts for holders and user demand as potential support, while noting the outcome is not guaranteed.

Cited as a comparison for trading costs, with roughly $900 in taker fees to open and close a $1 million position.

Mentioned as a platform offering around-the-clock tokenized stock products and perpetual contracts; the discussion provides no specific investment outlook.

The speaker views HYPE positively but considers it relatively expensive, favors a smaller actively managed position, and does not plan to hold much for the full cycle.

HYPE is described as reaching an all-time high amid renewed optimism.

Has performed independently of Bitcoin and Ethereum, including during broader market weakness; the author favors evaluating it based on fundamentals, capital inflows, and business performance.

The author believes HYPE is at a bottom; it is shown near $78.30 with a marked level around $94.24.

The hosts liked Hyperliquid’s trading product, liquidity, low fees and token-burning mechanism, but cautioned against chasing a rapid rise and stressed valuation and entry price.

The author hopes to accumulate HYPE, suggesting a bullish outlook.

Plunged from around 874 to a low of 820.20 on the 5-minute chart, with the chart showing 824.20; the weekend move was attributed to nervousness.

The investor said he likes Hyperliquid and cited it as a model demonstrating potential revenue accrual to token holders, while cautioning that token-versus-equity value allocation remains uncertain.

The speaker likes Hyperliquid and cited its model for returning revenue to token holders, while cautioning that the model is early and future equity issuance could change how value is divided.

The host was net long and described Hyperliquid as one of his most interesting crypto assets, citing potential benefits from the overlap of crypto, traditional-finance trading, and tokenization.

Although listed among past winners, the speaker says they are currently avoiding already-ripped projects such as Hyperliquid.

The speaker does not consider HYPE especially cheap at discussed prices and prefers to wait for a deeper pullback; revenue and buybacks have supported it.

Mentioned in price and position updates; the host said thin after-hours order books offered little reliable price discovery while he used the platform for a Tesla trade.

HYPE was described as a strong revenue-generating crypto asset that had risen substantially from its lows, but it fell about 10% in the sell-off. Revenue may differentiate it, though sharp corrections and speculative-market risks remain.

Options could complement its perpetual-futures business and offer growth potential, but regulatory requirements and the ability to attract liquidity are significant uncertainties.

Its HIP-4 proposal to add options could complement existing perpetual-futures activity. Product development and market access may support growth, while regulatory constraints could limit shared liquidity across jurisdictions.

The host is interested in HYPE and believes it could perform well, citing its token buyback mechanism. He acknowledges uncertainty about timing and entry price, and notes that quoted pool yields are not assured.

Cited as an altcoin trading near all-time highs, without a specific recommendation or trade setup.

The guest viewed Hyperliquid as a strong product with an exceptional founder and called its token trades among his best, but has no differentiated current view and does not establish that it is attractive at its current price.

The author may allocate a small portion of their portfolio to HYPE and suggests it could outperform most active crypto traders.

The guest wanted to see more downside and identified a long-term trend line near $65 as a possible entry area.

The speaker would be interested in buying after a further pullback toward a long-term trend line around $65; the view was primarily chart-based.

The guest called it his best trade ever, praising its product and founder, but sold his remaining tokens around $30–$40 and believes he sold too early. This is a retrospective account, not a current recommendation.

Mentioned as a comparable example of a token buyback-and-burn model.

Pal finds Hyperliquid interesting because it generates cash flow, but says it is outside his central investment thesis; this is not a negative assessment.

Mentioned among altcoins viewed broadly positively if they had fallen disproportionately and Bitcoin's bull-market trend continued; no asset-specific analysis was provided.

Paper Trade uses Hyperliquid’s mid-market price as its oracle, and Hyperliquid was noted for having a strong token community. No valuation outlook or direct investment thesis was provided.

Praised for execution, community, product development, and gains in market share, while valuation, airdrop expectations, and regulatory developments remain concerns.

Mentioned as part of market-price and performance commentary amid volatile crypto conditions, without a specific investment thesis.

Deployers must stake 500,000 HYPE to access market-deployment functionality, with slots allocated through Dutch auctions that reset approximately every 31 hours. The discussion described potential utility but offered no direct buy recommendation or evidence that token utility will translate into value for holders.

Hyperliquid showed relative strength compared with many crypto assets, though a deeper Bitcoin sell-off could still pull it lower.

Viewed as a potential long-term holding, though its durability has not yet been proven.

The speaker is strongly bullish on Hyperliquid's around-the-clock trading product and smaller market capitalization, and believes it could outperform BNB.

The token was down about 1.2%, less than the roughly 5% decline in a company associated with it, highlighting that treasury-company shares need not track their underlying tokens closely.