What top creators are saying about Hyperliquid(HYPE)— Page 2

The host cited about $5 million a day in perpetual trading activity, including when stock markets are closed, as evidence of active use.

The speaker was pretty bullish on Hyperliquid, citing its decentralized leverage platform and stock trading with up to 10x leverage, while leverage can magnify losses.

Rose around news of CFTC approval for an equity perpetual-futures contract, but no valuation case or recommendation was offered.

Cited as an example of a more vertically integrated or siloed platform, without a specific investment view.

Mentioned as an asset holders could place into pools to seek income; no specific price, fundamentals, or expected returns are discussed.

May be vulnerable to sharp swings amid consensus or high-funding perpetual trades; commentary notes a possible 20% drop followed by a 6% rebound and weeks of choppy trading before a larger move.

Mentioned as an asset people are holding, without further investment analysis.

Growth in TradFi-style trading and fee generation supports the investment case, but its substantial rally makes it less compelling than cheaper fee-generating alternatives.

Mentioned as a comparison or benchmark in the competitive landscape; no individual investment thesis or recommendation is given.

HYPE was around $85.60 and the host acknowledged audience enthusiasm, but gave no detailed investment thesis.

The author is bullish on prediction markets on Hyperliquid, citing 10× growth in daily HIP-4 outcomes volume over 30 days and fees 100× lower than on Polymarket and Kalshi.

Hyperliquid was mentioned as a trading platform, not as a token recommendation.

HYPE was mentioned as a possible crypto-market exception, and the host said he held a small amount. No performance figures or specific investment outlook were provided.

Its 24/7 markets provide signals outside traditional trading hours, and HYPE helps secure the network. Institutional interest is growing, but this does not establish that the platform or token will succeed.

Mentioned as the less-preferred pairing option compared with kinetiq:native.

A planned partnership to use Hyperliquid infrastructure for perpetual-futures markets could drive trading demand and token burns, but the rollout has not started and the thesis depends on implementation and adoption.

Praised as a model linking product utility and revenue to token-holder value through token buybacks and burns; no valuation or price target was given.

Hyperliquid-related technology and its HIP-3 framework were discussed in connection with real-world-asset markets and a proposed regulated US offering. Adoption remains uncertain amid concerns about liquidity, liquidations, automatic deleveraging, funding mechanics, and clearing. The discussion explicitly did not establish HYPE as a direct beneficiary.

The post criticizes selling HYPE based on a deleted tweet, noting that the information was also reported by the Financial Times.

The speaker did not add after a sharp rise and considers chasing unattractive due to poor risk/reward, though a long from a lower level may have looked better.

Praised as an example of linking token value to product usage, with revenue used to buy back and burn tokens. The discussion provides no valuation, risk assessment, or buy recommendation.

The speakers were comparatively bullish, citing relative resilience and potential traditional-finance adoption through the TradeXYZ partnership and growth in on-chain trading. They noted that broader market weakness could still affect HYPE.

Hyperliquid was described as a potentially important crypto-market primitive for a financial system developing alongside AI, but this was presented as a speculative, high-uncertainty thesis without a price target.

Mentioned as an example of activity in crypto and tokenized assets, without an investment recommendation or specific thesis.

HYPE was one of the few assets holding up well during the selloff. The host viewed its weekly chart as constructive above $75 and stronger than most of the market, conditional on holding that level.

The host was bullish on institutional interest, potential real-world financial use, and relative strength, while acknowledging volatility and failed trades.

The author expects Hyperliquid to reach triple-digit prices this weekend.

The speaker describes Hyperliquid as gaining traditional-finance support and discusses potential platform growth, but gives no direct buy or sell recommendation.

The post highlights strength in HYPE and suggests considering HyperEVM meme tokens while HYPE remains in double digits.

Viewed as a relative outperformer, with provisional support near $86; losing that area could weaken the outlook.

The Tradexyz–ICE partnership is viewed as a major development for Hyperliquid, with potential to expand perpetual futures into U.S. markets.

The host sold during the panic but might consider buying again; Mando saw potential but was wary of a popular, volatile trade.

The speaker has a positive outlook, suggesting decentralized trading platforms may attract users after a centralized-exchange hack, contingent on continued activity.

HYPE rose about 17% after ICE and TradeXYZ announced a proposed CFTC-regulated U.S. venue for perpetual futures built on Hyperliquid. The partnership is a notable validation, but regulatory approval, product launch, and sustained trading adoption remain uncertain.

The hosts were bullish long term on Hyperliquid’s potential to expand on-chain perpetual markets and gain institutional access, while warning that regulatory barriers, uncertain U.S. access, and the sharp rally to about $94–$95 create risks.

The hosts were bullish on the long-term opportunity if Hyperliquid expands its markets and establishes a meaningful U.S. presence. Regulatory disputes, liquidity fragmentation, and plateauing trading volume are important risks.

The host was bullish on the adoption theme around 24/7 trading and Hyperliquid infrastructure following partnership news, but gave no price target.

Investor interest and plans for U.S. perpetual futures on Hyperliquid were viewed positively for the perp DEX theme. The speaker praised tokenomics and buybacks but noted volatility and the risks of leveraged trading.

Mentioned among altcoins, but the speaker's wording does not establish a clear recommendation.

Highlighted at $90; the author wants to buy if its price dips.

Interested in buying at lower prices.

HYPE had held up relatively well, but the speaker cautioned against overinterpreting sharp price spikes.

The author sees an opportunity for Hyperliquid to support trading across asset classes as perpetual futures in traditional markets and onchain activity expand.

Its equity perpetuals and improved trading interfaces are identified as potential opportunities over the next few years.

The speaker speculated that Hyperliquid could benefit from the situation, but also panic-sold HYPE and believed they sold near the bottom. The comments were mixed and did not establish a durable thesis.

The speaker views the platform positively but has not bought HYPE because they are waiting for a deeper price correction; no specific entry target or timeline is given.

Mentioned as an example of a crypto business with high revenue per employee, without an investment thesis, valuation, or recommendation.

The speaker is bullish on potential growth in platform use, trading fees, and token buybacks, noting that 97% of HYPE-related revenue is used for buybacks. Price targets and adoption scenarios are speculative.

Presented as a high-risk way to gain exposure to on-chain derivatives activity. The host cites strong trading volume, fee-funded buybacks, and a possible breakout, while noting token unlocks and volatility as risks.

A speaker cited investor Stanley Druckenmiller's bullish view, but no investment recommendation or price target was given.