What top creators are saying about Avalanche(AVAX)

Identified as a foundational Layer 1 blockchain that may survive, without a specific recommendation between it and Ethereum.

Mentioned as an asset used in staking or DeFi strategies, with no detailed investment view.

Included in a broad comment that altcoins looked strong while Bitcoin appeared strong, without individual analysis or a specific catalyst.

A tentative 'down, up' chart pattern was mentioned, without a specific target or recommendation.

Named as a network where clients may access Russell data through Chainlink; blockchain adoption may support demand, but no specific outlook or target was offered.

Avalanche was named among networks involved in the incident; no individual investment outlook was provided.

Mentioned as a crypto peer for valuation comparison; no individual recommendation or price target is provided.

Avalanche was mentioned among altcoins in a generally cautious discussion, with no specific price target or recommendation.

Down 21% and grouped with altcoins that may be near support and accumulation areas, but no specific price level or confirmed buy signal was given.

AVAX was mentioned as an asset used in liquidity pools, but no price target or detailed long-term outlook was provided.

The host considers AVAX a potential breakout-retest accumulation opportunity at its 200-day moving average, while allowing for 10%–15% downside or variation.

The speaker describes AVAX as a potentially strong short setup but does not provide clearly readable trade levels.

Mentioned in a technical context, with no investment recommendation or outlook.

Schwab announced plans to expand direct access to AVAX to meet client demand; no specific use cases, valuation, or price expectations were discussed.

Avalanche was named among the tokens reportedly taken by the attacker; the host characterized price movement among affected tokens as generally limited.

Mentioned without a clear bullish thesis or specific investment recommendation.

The host held AVAX and considered a conditional long after a sweep and retest, while advising against chasing and expressing discomfort with shorting amid news risk.

The chart discussion noted bearish conditions below the point of control and 50-day moving average, balanced by a possible long zone and shorter-time-frame bullish divergence.

Mentioned in market-price updates without a developed individual investment thesis.

The speaker holds an AVAX long and would consider adding around $8.70–$8.80.

The speaker included AVAX among altcoins viewed broadly positively, while noting that altcoins could fall further if Bitcoin declines toward $75,000.

The speaker is gradually building a position while allowing for further declines; additions depend on how the market develops.

The speaker opened a starter position and placed another buy order at $8.75, with a stop-loss area of $8.40–$8.50. They planned to reassess after an initial move of roughly 10%–12%.

Charles Schwab added AVAX to its crypto trading platform, and Avalanche may see increased use from stablecoins and AI-agent payments. The effect on token demand remains uncertain.

The host viewed the late $8 range near the 200-day moving average as a preferred entry area.

Mentioned without a specific investment thesis, price target, or buy/sell guidance.

Named as one of the speaker’s favorite altcoins to accumulate during the pullback.

Mentioned in passing as a holding, possible pool asset, or example, without a detailed investment thesis.

The trader favored a short scalp after a sweep of nearby highs near the top of the range; no entry or target was specified.

Easton was bullish on Avalanche and said he was looking to buy more, citing use case, narrative appeal, investor attention, and staying power.

Avalanche was described as bearish and a possible short candidate, though a breakout could produce a strong move higher.

The host is watching for a long if the price holds a trendline area supported by Fibonacci and horizontal levels; no target or invalidation level was given.

Named among networks ahead of the XRP Ledger in RWA activity; no price target or direct buy recommendation is given.

Mentioned as one of the speaker’s preferred altcoins, but no asset-specific price level or trade setup was provided.

The outlook is conditional: the speaker expects possible additional losses before a large recovery and is waiting for further staggered entries.

The hosts categorized AVAX as safe. One had sold some for collateral management and planned to rebuy it, though little underlying analysis was given.

Mentioned among major altcoins, but no specific recommendation or additional investment commentary was provided.

A Middle East deal narrative was described as positive, with possible investor rotation into AVAX, but no levels or supporting details were given.

Pal considers Avalanche a possible layer-1 contender but expresses less conviction and notes that its economic density held up less well than that of Ethereum, Solana, and Sui.

Cited as a leader in the 2021 rally to illustrate shifting market leadership; no current outlook or recommendation was provided.

Cited as an example of an altcoin that could make a new cycle low in dollar terms even while Bitcoin holds a higher low.

Remains one of the host’s preferred altcoins for the current cycle, but they expect possible further downside and favor staged entries after signs of reversal.

Mentioned among large-cap altcoins and tokens with ETF products, without specific investment analysis.

The speaker is waiting for lower entry levels rather than chasing the price.

The speaker sees an opportunity if the breakout holds, but prefers waiting for a retest or support entry.

The author says identifying narratives early and rotating into AVAX helped compound gains in 2020–21, while emphasizing the importance of taking profits.

Mentioned as a coin some consider a competitor to SUI and as part of a trading-bot list; no detailed evaluation or price outlook is provided.

The host said an AVAX position in the advertised trading bot was up roughly $100–$200, but gave no price outlook or recommendation.

Bearish and viewed as an unattractive long-term holding; any short-term rebound is dependent on Bitcoin.

Cited as falling 62.1% intraday during the crash.