What top creators are saying about Blur(BLUR)

Blur’s shutdown was described as the end of an era, alongside skepticism about the lasting value of some NFT holdings. No specific market forecast or recommendation was given.

Cited as an example showing that prior token models and buybacks do not ensure lasting success.

Mentioned as an example of NFT-market activity and large orders. No specific investment thesis or view on future performance is offered.

Blur's historical NFT bidding incentives created a mechanics-driven trading opportunity, but the discussion offered no current investment outlook.

Mentioned in a comparative context regarding platform influence.

Up 50% recently on rumors of a new perpetuals product being developed by the founder.

Associated with a humorous/satirical social media post, highlighting the speculative nature of the project and the need for thorough due diligence beyond social media commentary.

Highlighted as a past success for identifying early opportunities by tracking sophisticated wallets on-chain.

Alleged to be a scam to dump tokens on retail investors, with its price dropping over 90%. Staking for Blast points was described as a mechanism for insiders to exit their positions, leading to the token's return to 'goblintown'.

Cited as a past successful investment as part of the thesis that investing in crypto exchanges is an 'evergreen' and recurring opportunity.

Mentioned as a historical comparison where its token launch coincided with the end of the NFT mania, serving as a cautionary tale for the Pump.fun launch.

The speaker has a very bearish view on the platform, stating it is 'dead' and 'donezo'.

A bearish view was expressed, suggesting the platform has 'stopped iterating' and may be 'done' after its initial hype cycle, with its recent airdrop being disappointing.