What top creators are saying about Aave(AAVE)

Named as a possible destination for tokenized assets and collateral. The discussion highlights potential utility from integrations but provides no forecast or recommendation.

Aave did not lose funds in the incident and its collateralized lending operated as designed. The protocol restricted new borrowing and deposits while working on more automated risk controls.

The speaker described Aave as having fallen roughly 80% from earlier highs and suggested that investors who remain confident in the project might hold or accumulate during declines, while cautioning that project quality does not guarantee token performance.

The speaker likes Aave and cited its role in borrowing against Bitcoin and scaling a portfolio, while noting it was down around 80% from prior highs.

Used as an example of borrowing against an asset such as ETH while retaining exposure; lending protocols could benefit if tokenized assets become accepted collateral.

The host regularly used Aave to lend and borrow against wrapped Bitcoin and other collateral, describing it as an established, widely available option.

The speaker uses Aave to borrow against Bitcoin and access liquidity. He notes AAVE is down about 80% from its all-time high, but cautions that the decline does not establish value and the project may still underperform.

The host values Aave’s crypto-collateral lending product and uses it to borrow against Bitcoin and Ethereum, but says token valuation is difficult and the investment is risky.

Attackers reportedly borrowed nearly 20,000 ETH against USDT connected to laundering activity, prompting market freezes. The episode highlighted protocol-contagion and disruption risks but gave no view on the AAVE token's price.

Wintermute reportedly holds a short position in Aave.

Mentioned as a platform for borrowing against Bitcoin and Ethereum as part of the host’s leveraged DeFi strategy; no asset-specific outlook is provided.

The speaker described Aave as a protocol for depositing crypto collateral and borrowing against it, while warning that falling collateral values can trigger liquidation.

Discussed as a platform for borrowing against crypto and deploying funds into yield strategies. Returns were described as variable, and borrowing and liquidation risks were acknowledged.

Tokenized-stock collateral could expand Aave's lending and borrowing market. Reported collateral was nearly $6 million after about a month, so adoption and lending growth remain important to monitor.

Aave reportedly halted new transactions shortly after the Binance incident. The discussion highlighted risks around emergency controls and the handling of frozen or impaired assets such as USDC.

Mentioned as a platform the speaker uses for borrowing against Bitcoin. The transcript gives no specific investment recommendation or price outlook for Aave.

The speaker suggests a risky weekend scalp long after a retest and says to abandon the setup if the retest does not occur within three 15-minute candles. They also bought more around $120.

AAVE was affected when the attacker used the lending protocol to borrow against stablecoins; the discussion highlighted indirect exploit exposure but offered no directional recommendation.

AAVE reached previously discussed potential buying levels and bounced near a 0.618 level. The speaker recommends waiting for panic and volatility to settle, noting prices could fall further.

The speaker says the affected tokens had already been sold and were beginning to recover, with Binance buybacks potentially offsetting selling pressure; they see little case for shorting AAVE after the initial sell-off.

Aave was mentioned as a possible route for hackers to deposit stolen assets as collateral and borrow against them. The speaker said little had reportedly moved through Aave and some funds had been frozen; this was not an investment recommendation.

The speaker says Aave paused loans amid reported security concerns, but the claims are not independently verified in the transcript.

A report alleged that the suspected attacker deposited USDT on Aave and borrowed ETH against it, highlighting potential interactions between collateral, borrowing, and asset freezes; the account was unverified and the host offered no broader investment outlook.

The speaker said Aave had approved something and later reported that lending markets were frozen, but the context and scope were unclear. The effect on the asset or protocol could not be assessed.

Used to hold stablecoins for potential purchases during market sell-offs.

Could benefit as tokenized assets, stablecoins, and broader financial activity move on-chain; no asset-specific target is provided.

The speaker values Aave's borrowing product but says AAVE has performed poorly and cautions that product usefulness does not necessarily support the token price.

Aave is used by SteakhouseFi to manage the Earn+ vault strategy, which is promoted as offering a 12% dollar yield with no lockup for eligible users.

The host suggested the decline from about $189 to $130 could offer a lower entry price and noted a retest of a key chart level, without making a specific recommendation.

AAVE is listed among the original portfolio holdings, but no specific price level, additional purchase recommendation, or asset-specific rationale is provided.

Named among protocols being reviewed, without asset-specific revenue, buyback, valuation, or recommendation details.

The speaker mentions using Aave to borrow against crypto holdings as part of a strategy that deploys borrowed funds into liquidity pools.

The speaker describes using Aave to borrow against Bitcoin and access liquidity pools, but emphasizes that earning money through protocol use does not mean he profited from holding the AAVE token.

The speaker finds Aave's lending product useful for borrowing against crypto holdings, but says the token has not done well. He distinguishes the product's utility from the token's investment performance.

The speaker is waiting for a potential buying range of $130–$140, near support around the 200-day EMA, while noting Bitcoin weakness could affect whether AAVE reaches it.

Used in an example of borrowing against a BTC position; the discussion concerns the lending platform, not a recommendation to buy the AAVE token.

The speaker and his group use Aave in DeFi strategies, but notes that protocol utility may not be reflected in the token's market price and provides no valuation view.

Recommended as a platform for collateralized borrowing; the speaker preferred it for lower costs and the absence of required monthly payments.

Mentioned as an example from DeFi and yield-farming cycles. No specific investment view was offered.

Aave was named among lending platforms associated with buybacks, which the speaker presented as a conditional theme rather than a stand-alone buy signal.

Likely the lending protocol referred to as 'Avi'; a borrowing rate of about 4.8% per year was cited, with the caveat that rates and terms vary. No recommendation to buy the protocol token was given.

The speaker may invest in Aave and says he uses it for Bitcoin-backed loans, describing it as a possible social bet. The discussion does not detail DeFi borrowing risks.

Listed as an example of a blue-chip token in the proposed portfolio framework, with no project-specific analysis or price target.

The speaker uses Aave to borrow against crypto and considers buying AAVE in a possible 2027 allocation. He cautions that the usefulness of the protocol does not guarantee token performance.

Aave was cited as a possible app integration within FraxNet; whether this would increase users or value for AAVE was not addressed.

One host praised Aave as a valuable DeFi product and described income generated through borrowing strategies, but the enthusiasm focused on the service rather than owning the AAVE token.

The speaker highlighted rising active loans, total value locked, fees, revenue, and daily active users trending toward roughly 25,000, alongside growth in Aave V4.

The host finds the Aave platform highly useful for borrowing and managing liquidity strategies, but says platform usefulness does not necessarily translate into strong token performance. He holds a small amount through its safety module.

Mentioned as an early DeFi investment that contributed to historical returns; no current recommendation was provided.

Aave is cited as infrastructure that can support stablecoin-based financial products and yield offerings; the proposed yield-optimizing product is hypothetical.