it's the market finally starting to realize the potential $PONS does $56m in annualized revenue while $PUMP does $460m 80% of Pons' revenue buys and burns $PONS, while 50% of Pumpfun's revenue buys and burns $PUMP $PUMP is trading at a $2b valuation and is rightly regarded by many as undervalued so would it really be unfair to value $PONS at 10% of PUMP's valuation at the absolute bare minimum? that would put PONS at a $200m market cap and i see many people suggesting that the current PA is simply anticipation of an incoming Robinhood listing that's missing the forest for the trees a Robinhood listing is inevitable for Pons β’ it is by far the most valuable protocol on the chain and has been responsible for 50% of all activity on the chain at one point β’ at least 5 tokens launched on Pons are currently trading above $10m market cap β’ at least 20 tokens launched on Pons are currently trading above $1m market cap Pons is probably driving around half of the economic activity on the entire Robinhood chain right now @vladtenev and other key Robinhood figures have made it clear that they intend to push Robinhood chain aggressively if $PUMP is already listed on Robinhood, then exactly what would prevent the biggest launchpad on Robinhood from being listed too? and why wouldn't that happen ASAP? this is why many people still don't get the PONS trade they have a vision problem and that's okay they'll find $PONS a lot more attractive once it's trading above $200m market cap