20VC: Anthropic Wipes Billions Off Markets | Citrini Research: The Ultimate Breakdown: Agents, "Ghost GDP", Consumer Spend etc. | Figma Earnings Beat & Four Public Stocks to Buy | Jack Altman Joins Benchmark
20VC: Anthropic Wipes Billions Off Markets | Citrini Research: The Ultimate Breakdown: Agents, "Ghost GDP", Consumer Spend etc. | Figma Earnings Beat & Four Public Stocks to Buy | Jack Altman Joins Benchmark
Podcast1 hr 20 min
Listen to Episode
Note: AI-generated summary based on third-party content. Not financial advice. Read more.
Quick Insights

Atlassian (TEAM) is presented as a compelling value opportunity, as its stock has been heavily sold off despite its revenue growth accelerating to 23%. For a high-risk momentum play on the AI agent theme, Palantir (PLTR) is a primary option showing "jaw-dropping" revenue acceleration from its AI offerings. Investors should avoid **Klav

Detailed Analysis

CrowdStrike (CRWD)

  • The stock, along with other cybersecurity names like Cloudflare (NET), was hit hard by news of an Anthropic security feature, wiping out billions in market value.
  • The podcast hosts believe this was a market overreaction, as the AI capabilities announced by Anthropic are not new and already exist in some form. They do not see Anthropic directly eating into CrowdStrike's core business in the near term.
  • The main issue highlighted for CRWD was its extremely high valuation. It was described as being "priced for perfection."
    • Even after the stock dropped, it was trading at 16x revenues with 22% projected revenue growth.
  • The high valuation makes the stock vulnerable to any negative news or perceived increase in "tail risk," even if the direct threat isn't immediate.
  • Even after the price correction, the stock is not considered "cheap."

Takeaways

  • CrowdStrike is a high-quality company, but its stock carries significant valuation risk. When a stock is priced for perfection, any news that questions its long-term dominance can cause a sharp drop.
  • The direct threat from AI models like Anthropic's Claude may be overstated for now, as enterprise security is a complex layer that won't be easily replaced by a single AI feature.
  • Investors should be cautious. The stock is not a clear "buy" at its current price, as it's still not considered a value play. It's more of a bet on continued market leadership in a world with increasing AI-related uncertainty.

Palantir (PLTR)

  • Palantir was singled out as the only publicly traded B2B company that has a competitive agent and is seeing "jaw-dropping acceleration" in revenue due to its AI offerings.
  • This success is contrasted with other B2B software companies that are merely "sprinkling AI dust" on their products without seeing real revenue impact.
  • The stock is mentioned as one of the five "core" B2B tech stocks that are up over the last year, putting it in a basket of "momentum" investments.
  • Despite its momentum, the stock has been hit in the last three months, down 27% from its highs. It trades at a very high multiple (mentioned as being down from 70x to 46x revenues), which carries significant risk.

Takeaways

  • Palantir is presented as a rare example of a public company successfully monetizing the "AI agent" trend, giving it strong momentum.
  • For investors looking to bet directly on the AI agent theme in public markets, PLTR is identified as a primary, albeit expensive and volatile, option.
  • This is a high-risk, high-reward momentum play. The extreme valuation means the stock could fall sharply if its growth narrative falters.

Atlassian (TEAM)

  • Atlassian was highlighted as the most compelling value play among the B2B software stocks discussed.
  • It was the worst performer of its peer group over the last year, with the stock down -74.85%.
  • Despite the massive stock price decline, the company's fundamentals are improving. Its revenue growth is accelerating, from 20% a year ago to 23% now, at a scale of $6.3 billion in revenue.
  • This disconnect—a massive price drop combined with accelerating growth—is described as the "greatest dislocation in the market" for this sector.

Takeaways

  • For value-oriented investors, Atlassian presents a potentially significant opportunity. The market has punished the stock severely, but the business itself is performing well and even accelerating.
  • The investment thesis is a classic "buy the dip" on a quality asset that has been oversold. The combination of a beaten-down price and accelerating fundamentals is a rare find.
  • The risk is that the market continues to favor momentum and avoids "bargain" stocks in the face of broader AI disruption fears. However, based on the discussion, TEAM is presented as the top pick for an investor looking for value in the B2B software space.

Shopify (SHOP) vs. Klaviyo (KVYO)

  • Shopify (SHOP) is seen as being at "partial risk" of disruption from the AI agentic layer, but its CEO, Toby Lütke, is considered one of the "best of the best" and is actively addressing the AI trend.
  • Shopify has shown incredible productivity, growing revenue by 50% to $12 billion over three years without adding any net new employees.
  • Klaviyo (KVYO) is described as being "essentially a derivative of Shopify," with its revenue being highly attached to the Shopify ecosystem.
  • A major dislocation was pointed out: over the last year, Shopify's stock is slightly up (+2.63%), while Klaviyo's is down significantly (-58%).
  • A bargain hunter might be tempted to buy the cheaper stock, Klaviyo. However, the hosts warn this could be a mistake.

Takeaways

  • The core insight is that for Shopify to thrive in the age of AI, it will likely need to build its own agentic capabilities, which would directly compete with and potentially "kill" Klaviyo by absorbing its market value.
  • This makes Klaviyo a "value trap" candidate. While it looks cheap relative to its partner Shopify, its entire business is at existential risk from its primary partner.
  • The safer bet, despite the higher valuation, is on the platform (Shopify) over the application (Klaviyo). Investors should be wary of buying companies whose core function could be integrated into the larger platform they depend on.

Figma (Private)

  • Figma reported a "great quarter" with accelerating growth. It reached $1.2 billion in ARR, growing 40% year-over-year, up from 38% in the previous quarter.
  • The stock was up 15% in private markets after the earnings report.
  • Despite strong performance, there is significant concern about its long-term durability against AI tools like Anthropic's Claude Code, which are rapidly improving their ability to generate designs automatically.
  • The host speculates that by the end of the year, AI could create "genuinely custom, artistic, artisanal, beautiful designs," which would be a direct threat to Figma's core use case.
  • Figma is included in the basket of five "momentum" stocks that are winning in the current market.

Takeaways

  • Figma is currently executing flawlessly and is a leader in its category, which is reflected in its strong growth and private market valuation.
  • However, it is on the front lines of AI disruption. The core function of design is highly susceptible to being automated by advanced AI models.
  • An investment in Figma (if possible for the public) is a bet that it can innovate faster than the underlying AI models can commoditize its product. It's a "fight back" story against a powerful disruptive force.

Other B2B SaaS Stocks (DocuSign, Toast, Monday)

  • A general theme is that many established B2B SaaS companies are now "absurdly cheap" on a valuation basis.
  • DocuSign (DOCU) and Toast (TOST) were mentioned as examples, trading at low multiples like 7 or 8 times revenues.
  • Monday.com (MNDY) was cited as trading at just 1.5 times revenues.
  • The hosts believe that while these companies won't be "destroyed" overnight, they are at risk of being "maimed" as AI agents take over parts of their workflows and capture incremental value.
  • Toast is viewed as potentially more durable because its business is tied to physical restaurant operations and payments, which is less susceptible to disruption than pure knowledge-work software like Monday.com.

Takeaways

  • There may be value opportunities in beaten-down SaaS stocks, but investors must be highly selective.
  • The key is to differentiate between companies whose core value proposition is at risk (e.g., knowledge work automation) and those with more durable, real-world integrations (e.g., payments, logistics, complex workflows).
  • A "basket approach" was suggested: buying a group of 20 of these cheap stocks (e.g., average of 3x revenues) could be a winning strategy, as the overall low valuation provides a margin of safety. Avoid betting on a single name unless you have high conviction in its durability.

Investment Theme: AI Disruption & "Agentic Layer"

  • The central thesis of the discussion is that an "agentic layer" of AI is emerging that will disrupt almost all existing B2B software.
  • The companies that "own the agents" in a specific category will capture most of the future value.
  • Most incumbent public companies are seen as failing to build competitive agents, instead just adding superficial AI features. This leaves them vulnerable.
  • The pace of change is incredibly fast. Products and features that were cutting-edge months ago are now becoming obsolete. The hosts describe this as the "Fortnite circle shrinking" for existing software companies.
  • This disruption creates a "ghost GDP" effect, where productivity and corporate profits rise, but the value accrues to a very small number of people and AI models, potentially softening overall consumer spending.

Takeaways

  • Long-term bearish on most incumbent B2B SaaS stocks. The risk is not necessarily that they will go out of business, but that their growth will slow dramatically, making them "irrelevant" and poor investments.
  • Look for the disruptors. The biggest opportunities are in the new startups (or public companies like Palantir) that are successfully building and deploying valuable AI agents that solve specific problems.
  • Prioritize durability. When investing in incumbents, look for businesses with deep, complex integrations, regulatory moats, or real-world physical components that are harder for pure software agents to disrupt. Examples cited were financial services with deep banking partnerships (Airwallex) or energy companies with physical infrastructure (Fuse Energy).
Ask about this postAnswers are grounded in this post's content.
Episode Description
AGENDA: 03:55 Anthropic Security Product Wipes Billions Off Public Markets 11:17 Do Agents Turn SaaS Incumbents into Valueless Databases 22:07 Anthropic Secondary Sale Makes Hundreds Decamillionaires 23:20 Citrini Research Piece: Everything You Need To Know 26:04 Will DoorDash Be Replaced by Agents 34:22 Will "Ghost GDP" Soften Consumer Spending Power 42:46 Why No Public Company Has Created a Good Agent Product 47:19 Is Tech Private Equity and Thoma Bravo F***** in this Market 51:05 OpenAI Massively Increases Spending Plans: Analysis 56:24 Figma Fights Back: Earnings Through the Roof 01:02:12 Momentum Versus Value: Four Public Stocks to Buy 01:09:30 Jack Altman Joins Benchmark Capital
About The Twenty Minute VC (20VC): Venture Capital | Startup Funding | The Pitch
The Twenty Minute VC (20VC): Venture Capital | Startup Funding | The Pitch

The Twenty Minute VC (20VC): Venture Capital | Startup Funding | The Pitch

By Harry Stebbings

The Twenty Minute VC (20VC) interviews the world's greatest venture capitalists with prior guests including Sequoia's Doug Leone and Benchmark's Bill Gurley. Once per week, 20VC Host, Harry Stebbings is also joined by one of the great founders of our time with prior founder episodes from Spotify's Daniel Ek, Linkedin's Reid Hoffman, and Snowflake's Frank Slootman. If you would like to see more of The Twenty Minute VC (20VC), head to www.20vc.com for more information on the podcast, show notes, resources and more.