Ben & Jerry's Co-Founder Wants to Be Set Free
Ben & Jerry's Co-Founder Wants to Be Set Free
Podcast23 min 27 sec
Listen to Episode
Note: AI-generated summary based on third-party content. Not financial advice. Read more.
Quick Insights

Investors should monitor Unilever's (UL) plan to spin off its entire ice cream division, which includes the Ben & Jerry's and Magnum brands. This corporate action could unlock value for UL shareholders by separating the parent company from the ongoing public conflict with Ben & Jerry's. However, the new, publicly-traded ice cream company will inherit significant brand risk, as Unilever has stated it will not sell Ben & Jerry's as a standalone brand. The brand's co-founder believes its value will be "destroyed" if its social activism is curtailed, posing a threat to the new entity's valuation. Consider the potential upside for Unilever (UL) while being cautious about the long-term prospects of the future ice cream spin-off.

Detailed Analysis

Unilever (UL)

  • Unilever is the parent company of Ben & Jerry's, having acquired the ice cream brand in 2000.
  • The transcript highlights a significant and public conflict between Unilever and the Ben & Jerry's brand, stemming from the brand's social and political activism.
    • Unilever is accused by co-founder Ben Cohen of "muzzling" the brand's social mission, particularly after Ben & Jerry's decided to stop sales in Israeli-occupied territories in 2021.
    • Unilever's position is that Ben & Jerry's has been advocating for "one-sided, highly controversial and polarizing topics" that put the parent company and its employees at risk.
  • Unilever is planning to spin off its entire ice cream division, which includes Ben & Jerry's and Magnum, into a new, independent company.
  • Unilever has stated that Ben & Jerry's is an important part of this new ice cream business and is not for sale as a standalone brand, despite interest from co-founder Ben Cohen and other investors.

Takeaways

  • Potential for Value Unlock: The spin-off of the ice cream division could be a positive for Unilever investors. It would allow the parent company to shed a business unit that is causing significant public relations and management challenges, enabling it to focus on its other core segments.
  • Brand and Reputational Risk: Investors should be aware of the ongoing public dispute. The conflict with a popular and "values-led" brand like Ben & Jerry's could negatively impact Unilever's broader corporate reputation, especially among socially-conscious consumers.
  • Uncertainty in the Spin-Off: The future value of the new, publicly-traded ice cream company is uncertain. The unresolved conflict with its most iconic brand, Ben & Jerry's, could weigh on the new company's valuation and performance from day one. Ben Cohen explicitly states he believes the Ben & Jerry's brand will be "destroyed" if its activism is curtailed, which would harm the new entity.

Ben & Jerry's (Potential Private Investment)

  • Ben & Jerry's is not a publicly traded company; it is a subsidiary of Unilever.
  • Co-founder Ben Cohen is actively seeking "socially aligned investors" to help buy Ben & Jerry's from Unilever and take it private.
  • The investment thesis is that the brand's value is intrinsically linked to its social mission. By separating from Unilever, the brand could operate freely and authentically, which Cohen believes is essential for its survival and success.
  • Cohen believes that if the brand remains under a corporate structure that stifles its activism, it will become "another part of the corporate mush" and lose its loyal customer base.

Takeaways

  • Niche Investment Opportunity: This represents a potential opportunity for private equity firms or accredited investors with an interest in impact investing. The goal would be to acquire a well-known brand and restore its founding mission.
  • High-Risk and Contentious: This is a highly speculative opportunity. Unilever has publicly stated it will not sell Ben & Jerry's as a standalone brand. Any attempt to acquire it would likely involve a difficult and potentially hostile corporate battle.
  • Binary Outcome: The future of the Ben & Jerry's brand appears to be at a crossroads.
    • If Cohen and his investors succeed, they could revitalize the brand on their own terms.
    • If they fail, and the brand is integrated into the new Unilever spin-off without its independent voice, Cohen predicts the brand's value will be "destroyed." This poses a significant risk to the valuation of the new ice cream company that Unilever plans to create.
Ask about this postAnswers are grounded in this post's content.
Episode Description
Last month, Ben & Jerry’s co-founder Jerry Greenfield quit the brand after 47 years, accusing parent company Unilever of not allowing the company to speak out on social issues. Host Jessica Mendoza talks to Ben Cohen, the co-founder who stayed, about why he’s not leaving, what he wants next for the company, and why political messaging is important for his ice cream brand.  Further Listening:  - Why Ben & Jerry’s Is Suing its Parent Company Over Israel - Kraft Heinz’s Big Breakup Sign up for WSJ’s free What’s News newsletter.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
About The Journal.
The Journal.

The Journal.

By The Wall Street Journal & Spotify Studios

The most important stories about money, business and power. Hosted by Ryan Knutson and Jessica Mendoza. The Journal is a co-production of Spotify and The Wall Street Journal. Get show merch here: https://wsjshop.com/collections/clothing