The sneaky way companies get new chemicals into our food
The sneaky way companies get new chemicals into our food
1 hour agoPlanet MoneyNPR
Podcast35 min 41 sec
Listen to Episode
Note: AI-generated summary based on third-party content. Not financial advice. Read more.
Quick Insights

Investors should exercise caution with Health-Focused food startups and biotech-food companies that rely on the GRAS (Generally Recognized as Safe) loophole to bypass FDA testing, as this creates significant long-term litigation and regulatory risk.

For those holding shares in food conglomerates like Chobani, it is critical to audit recent acquisitions for "hidden liabilities" tied to unvetted ingredients or "secret" additives that could trigger catastrophic brand collapse.

Prioritize investments in "Ultra-Transparent" food brands that voluntarily adhere to stricter European safety standards or hold Third-Party Certifications like the Clean Label Project, as these companies are better positioned to survive an inevitable regulatory crackdown on food additives.

When evaluating the risk profile of food processors, favor companies with robust product liability insurance and mandatory arbitration clauses in their terms of service to mitigate the financial impact of potential class-action lawsuits.

Long-term portfolios should shift toward companies focused on "whole foods" with minimal ingredient lists, as consumer sentiment and political momentum from figures like RFK Jr. move away from processed substitutes and synthetic flavorings.

Detailed Analysis

Food Additives and "GRAS" Loophole

The podcast highlights a significant regulatory gap in the U.S. food industry regarding how new chemicals and ingredients reach consumers. Under the 1958 Food Additives Amendment, while new additives technically require FDA approval, a loophole known as GRAS (Generally Recognized as Safe) allows companies to bypass rigorous testing.

  • Self-Certification: Companies can use in-house scientists to "self-certify" that a new chemical is safe without independent FDA verification.
  • The "Secret GRAS" Door: Notification to the FDA is voluntary. Companies can introduce brand-new substances (like Terra Flour) into the food supply without ever informing the regulator.
  • Lack of Accountability: Even when mass poisonings occur, the FDA often lacks the immediate power to fine companies or shutter them; accountability is primarily driven by private litigation.

Takeaways

  • Sector Risk: Investors in "Health-Focused" or "Clean Label" food startups should perform deep due diligence on ingredient sourcing. A single unvetted additive can lead to massive litigation and brand collapse.
  • Regulatory Shift: There is growing political momentum (notably from the current administration and figures like RFK Jr.) to close the GRAS loophole. If mandatory FDA reviews are reinstated, the "time-to-market" for new food innovations will increase significantly, potentially hurting short-term growth for biotech-food companies.
  • Liability Exposure: Companies using "Secret GRAS" ingredients face "tail risk"—long-term health issues (cancer, reproductive issues) that may not surface for decades but could lead to catastrophic class-action lawsuits in the future.

Daily Harvest / Chobani

Daily Harvest, a direct-to-consumer frozen meal company, faced a major crisis after its "Lentil + Leek Crumble" caused hundreds of cases of liver and gallbladder failure.

  • Acquisition Context: The podcast mentions that Daily Harvest was ultimately purchased by Chobani (a major player in the yogurt and dairy-alternative space).
  • Legal Strategy: The company used "Terms of Service" agreements to force customers into arbitration, attempting to limit their ability to sue in open court.
  • Supply Chain Failure: The company relied on a U.S. importer (Smirks) and a Peruvian manufacturer (Molinos) for Terra Flour, assuming the ingredient was safe based on a single, company-funded rat study.

Takeaways

  • M&A Warning: For investors in large food conglomerates like Chobani, this highlights the "hidden liabilities" involved in acquiring trendy startups. Due diligence must extend beyond financials into the specific regulatory path (GRAS vs. FDA approved) of every ingredient in the target's portfolio.
  • Brand Fragility: Despite being backed by major players, the Daily Harvest brand suffered significant damage. Investors should favor companies with transparent, third-party verified supply chains over those relying on "proprietary" or "secret" superfoods.

Food Safety Litigation (The "Bill Marler" Factor)

In the U.S. food system, private trial attorneys often act as the primary "regulators" when the government fails to intervene.

  • Subpoena Power: Private attorneys have more power than the FDA to "peer behind the secret door," using depositions and discovery to uncover how ingredients were vetted.
  • Settlement Costs: The Terra Flour case resulted in roughly $32 million in settlements. While significant, the podcast notes this is often just a "nick in the armor" for large corporations.

Takeaways

  • Insurance as a Safeguard: When evaluating food companies, investors should look at the robustness of their product liability insurance. In the Daily Harvest case, insurance payouts covered much of the settlement, potentially saving the parent company from insolvency.
  • Arbitration Clauses: Companies that successfully implement mandatory arbitration in their user agreements have a lower risk profile for investors, as it limits the scale and public visibility of class-action lawsuits (though, as noted, these do not apply to third parties like "nursing babies" or guests).

Alternative Investment Themes: The "Precautionary Principle"

The podcast contrasts the U.S. "market-first" approach with the Precautionary Principle used in Europe and New Zealand.

  • European/NZ Models: These regions require pre-market safety verification. This creates a higher barrier to entry but results in more stable, lower-risk food environments.
  • Market Opportunity: There is a growing market for "Ultra-Transparent" food brands that voluntarily follow stricter European safety standards even while operating in the U.S.

Takeaways

  • Investment Opportunity: Look for companies that utilize Third-Party Certifications (e.g., Non-GMO Project, NSF Certified for Sport, or Clean Label Project). These companies are essentially "de-risking" themselves from future regulatory crackdowns on the GRAS loophole.
  • Long-Term Health Trends: As public awareness of additives like ethyl acrylate or partially hydrogenated oils grows, consumer sentiment is shifting toward "whole foods" (bananas, lentils) rather than "processed substitutes" (crumbles, synthetic flavorings). Long-term portfolios should lean toward companies with minimal ingredient lists.
Ask about this postAnswers are grounded in this post's content.
Episode Description
99% of chemicals in our food right now were added without FDA approval. Many were added in secret, through a sneaky loophole built into the 1958 Food Additives Amendment. It was supposed to require FDA approval for new additives. But food companies and chemical makers found a workaround. And the FDA formally okayed the loophole in the 90s — in the process bringing attention to a loophole to the loophole. The FDA has essentially admitted it doesn’t have the capacity to verify the safety of new food chemicals. So they leave it up to food companies and chemical makers to declare their brand new chemicals are safe. These chemicals are used in everything from chocolate and smoked fish, to tea bags, protein drinks, popcorn, and seeds. So, how’d the loophole get there, and what does it tell us about the priority the U.S. places on safety versus speed and innovation? And, how much can one lawyer do about it? Live show tour and book info. / Subscribe to Planet Money+ Listen free: Apple Podcasts, Spotify, the NPR app or anywhere you get podcasts. Facebook / Instagram / TikTok / Our weekly Newsletter. This episode was hosted by Sarah Gonzalez, produced by Sam Yellowhorse Kesler, edited by Jess Jiang, fact checked by Sierra Juarez, and engineered by Robert Rodrguez with help from Kwesi Lee. Alex Goldmark is Planet Money’s executive producer.   See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences. NPR Privacy Policy
About Planet Money
Planet Money

Planet Money

By NPR

Wanna see a trick? Give us any topic and we can tie it back to the economy. At <em>Planet Money</em>, we explore the forces that shape our lives and bring you along for the ride. Don't just understand the economy – understand the world.<br><br><em>Wanna go deeper? <em>Subscribe to </em><em>Planet Money+ and get sponsor-free episodes of Planet Money, The Indicator, and Planet Money Summer School. Plus access to bonus content. It's a new way to support the show you love. Learn more at plus.npr.org/planetmoney</em><br></em>