Trump’s Alive, China Flaunts BFFs, and Scott’s Back!
Trump’s Alive, China Flaunts BFFs, and Scott’s Back!
246 days agoPivotNew York Magazine
Podcast1 hr 18 min
Listen to Episode
Note: AI-generated summary based on third-party content. Not financial advice. Read more.
Quick Insights

Consider Alphabet (GOOGL) as a top investment, as the recent favorable antitrust ruling has removed a major risk while the stock remains attractively valued. Exercise caution with Tesla (TSLA) due to intense competition from lower-cost Chinese EV makers like BYD (BYDDF), which threatens its core auto business. A bearish outlook is warranted for legacy media companies like Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) and Fox Corp (FOXA), which face declining viewership and unsustainable cost structures. Monitor the potential Supreme Court decision to strike down Chinese tariffs, as this would be a significant positive event for the stock market. If tariffs are removed, expect a rally in "old economy" stocks such as Caterpillar (CAT) and Procter & Gamble (PG).

Detailed Analysis

Alphabet (GOOGL)

  • Scott Galloway identified Alphabet as his big tech stock pick for the year.
  • The stock was seen as undervalued, trading at 17 times earnings a few weeks ago, which is cheaper than the S&P 500 average of 24 times earnings.
  • The company is considered a bargain compared to an average S&P company like Procter & Gamble (PG), given its strong growth and market position.
  • Bullish arguments for Google include:
    • It still gets 96 times the traffic of ChatGPT.
    • It owns YouTube, the largest streaming service in the world.
    • It has three other businesses that each generate over $30 billion in annual revenue.
    • It has five products with at least two billion users each.
    • It is a leader in autonomous driving, considered a very interesting application of AI.
  • The recent antitrust ruling was seen as a major positive for the stock. The "overhang" or cloud of uncertainty from the lawsuit has been lifted.
  • The remedy from the antitrust case was described as a "slap on the wrist," as Google will not be forced to sell off Chrome or Android. The market reacted positively, with shares up 12% in the five days leading up to the podcast taping.
  • The judge in the case noted that the rise of AI is already changing the competitive landscape, which may have contributed to the lenient ruling.

Takeaways

  • The podcast presents a bullish case for Alphabet, suggesting it was undervalued due to the uncertainty of the antitrust lawsuit. With the ruling being less harsh than expected, a major risk has been removed.
  • Investors may see the current situation as a positive, as the company retains its core structure while only facing minor remedies like data sharing.
  • The discussion suggests Google is well-positioned to translate its dominance in search into the new AI landscape, potentially creating an "AI monopoly."
  • Despite the bullish short-term outlook, the hosts also argued that a breakup (e.g., spinning off YouTube) would ultimately be good for competition and could unlock even more shareholder value in the long run, similar to the historic breakup of AT&T.

Big Tech & Antitrust (Investment Theme)

  • The podcast heavily criticized the current lack of aggressive antitrust action against major tech companies like Alphabet (GOOGL), Amazon (AMZN), and Meta (META).
  • A core argument is that breaking up these "big four" tech companies into smaller entities would be a massive benefit to the economy.
  • Historical Precedent: The breakup of AT&T was cited as a huge success. It led to a dramatic drop in the cost of long-distance calls and unlocked immense shareholder value, as each of the new "baby Bells" eventually became worth more than the original company. The breakup also unleashed new technologies like cell service and fiber that the monopoly was holding back.
  • A political candidate running on a "trust-busting" platform, similar to Teddy Roosevelt, could create a massive downward pressure on prices across many industries, effectively fighting inflation.
  • The hosts believe a breakup of Google would immediately spur competition; a spun-off YouTube would likely launch its own search engine, and Google would launch its own video platform.

Takeaways

  • This is a long-term investment theme to watch. Any serious political or regulatory momentum towards breaking up big tech could significantly alter the investment landscape.
  • While it may seem negative, a breakup could be a net positive for shareholders. The sum of the parts (e.g., AWS and the rest of Amazon, or YouTube and Google Search) could be worth more separately than they are together.
  • Increased competition from breakups would lower costs for advertisers and consumers, potentially benefiting the broader economy while creating new investment opportunities in the newly independent companies.

Tesla (TSLA) & EV Competition

  • The podcast highlights significant competitive pressure on Tesla from Chinese electric vehicle manufacturers, specifically BYD (BYDDF).
  • In Brazil, the host noted that Ubers were often BYD cars, described as "nice clean little Tesla-like" vehicles. The BYD Sunny model was mentioned as selling for as little as $8,000 in China.
  • This is contrasted with the average new car price in the U.S. of $50,000, versus $21,000 in China, highlighting a massive price advantage for Chinese competitors.
  • The host expressed skepticism about Elon Musk's claims that 80% of Tesla's value will eventually come from its Optimus humanoid robot, viewing it as a distraction from the company's imploding core business.

Takeaways

  • The sentiment towards Tesla is cautious to bearish, focusing on the rising threat from low-cost Chinese EV makers like BYD.
  • Investors should monitor the competitive landscape, as the significant price difference could erode Tesla's market share, especially in international markets.
  • Tesla's high valuation appears to be supported by speculative, long-term projects like humanoid robots. If the core auto business falters due to competition, the stock could be at risk of a major correction.

Media Sector (WBD, FOXA, CMCSA)

  • The podcast detailed a massive decline in viewership for traditional cable news networks.
  • Year-over-year viewership is down 30% for Fox News (FOXA), 27% for MSNBC (CMCSA), and a staggering 42% for CNN (WBD).
  • The core problem identified is the unsustainable cost structure, or "means of production." A show like The Colbert Show was cited as costing $100 million to produce while only making $60 million in revenue.
  • This is contrasted with the podcasting business model, which has much lower costs and can be highly profitable with a smaller but more targeted audience. The hosts' own podcast, for example, claims to reach 10 times the core advertising demographic (ages 25-54) as the average CNN show.
  • Newsmax filed a lawsuit against Fox News, accusing it of monopolistic practices. The host believes the lawsuit has no legal merit and is primarily a PR stunt for Newsmax.

Takeaways

  • The podcast presents a bearish outlook for legacy media companies dependent on the cable TV model. Their high fixed costs and declining viewership create a difficult financial situation.
  • Investors in companies like Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD), Fox Corp (FOXA), and Comcast (CMCSA) should be aware of these structural headwinds.
  • The future of media may involve radical restructuring, consolidation (e.g., merging newsrooms of CBS, ABC, and NBC), and a shift to lower-cost digital formats like podcasts. Talent and brands may be "arbed down" to more sustainable business models.

Geopolitics & Tariffs (Investment Theme)

  • A major geopolitical risk was identified: the strengthening alliance between China, Russia, and India. This trio represents a combined GDP of $20 trillion, significant energy resources, technology, and a massive consumer population, forming a "formidable, frightening alliance" against U.S. interests.
  • A prediction was made regarding the Trump-era tariffs on Chinese goods. An appellate court ruled the tariffs were illegally enacted.
  • Prediction: If the Supreme Court upholds this ruling and the administration decides to walk back the tariffs, it could be one of the biggest positive events for the stock market in years.
  • Rolling back the tariffs, which have risen from an average of 3% to 17%, could add 1% to 1.5% to U.S. GDP growth overnight.
  • The tariffs have disproportionately hurt "old economy" companies like Caterpillar (CAT) and P&G (PG), while leaving big tech companies like Meta (META), Nvidia (NVDA), and Broadcom (AVGO) largely unaffected.

Takeaways

  • The removal of Chinese tariffs would be a significant bullish catalyst for the stock market, particularly for the S&P 493 (the S&P 500 minus the top few tech giants).
  • Investors should watch for the Supreme Court's decision on the tariffs. A decision to strike them down could trigger a major rally in industrial, manufacturing, and consumer goods sectors that have been hampered by higher costs.
  • This event would represent a "transfer of wealth" back to the old economy companies that have been struggling under the tariff regime.
Ask about this postAnswers are grounded in this post's content.
Episode Description
Brace yourselves, Scott has returned! He and Kara discuss the rumors about President Trump’s health, China's push to form a new world order, and the latest plans for National Guard deployment. Plus, Google's antitrust win, and Newsmax files a lawsuit against Fox. Watch this episode on the ⁠⁠Pivot YouTube channel⁠⁠. Follow us on Instagram and Threads at ⁠⁠@pivotpodcastofficial⁠⁠. Follow us on Bluesky at ⁠⁠@pivotpod.bsky.social⁠⁠. Follow us on TikTok at ⁠⁠@pivotpodcast⁠⁠. Send us your questions by calling us at 855-51-PIVOT, or at ⁠⁠nymag.com/pivot⁠⁠. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
About Pivot
Pivot

Pivot

By New York Magazine

Every Tuesday and Friday, tech journalist Kara Swisher and NYU Professor Scott Galloway offer sharp, unfiltered insights into the biggest stories in tech, business, and politics. They make bold predictions, pick winners and losers, and bicker and banter like no one else. After all, with great power comes great scrutiny. From New York Magazine and the Vox Media Podcast Network.