Jack McClendon on Why It's So Hard to Create a New American Oil Boom
Jack McClendon on Why It's So Hard to Create a New American Oil Boom
19 days agoOdd LotsBloomberg
Podcast46 min 18 sec
Listen to Episode
Note: AI-generated summary based on third-party content. Not financial advice. Read more.
Quick Insights

Investors should prioritize high-conviction mega-caps like ExxonMobil (XOM) and Chevron (CVX), as these industry leaders are best positioned to benefit from sector consolidation and disciplined capital returns. Focus on the $70–$75 per barrel price range for West Texas Intermediate (WTI), as this "sweet spot" maintains producer margins without triggering demand destruction. Be cautious of smaller independent producers who face a margin squeeze from "sticky" service inflation and rising labor costs that do not retreat when oil prices dip. Monitor the Permian Basin inventory closely, as the depletion of "Tier 1" acreage over the next 5 to 10 years will likely drive up the long-term cost of production. When trading price spikes, account for a 4 to 6-month lag before new U.S. supply can realistically hit the market to stabilize prices.

Detailed Analysis

U.S. Oil & Gas Sector (Upstream)

The U.S. oil industry has transitioned from a "growth at all costs" model to one defined by capital discipline. While the U.S. is currently the world's largest producer (~13 million barrels per day), the rapid supply responses seen in previous decades have slowed due to investor demands for dividends and geological maturation.

  • Shift in Incentives: Historically, executive compensation was tied to production growth. Today, investors (led by firms like Kimmeridge) have forced a shift toward rewarding shareholders through dividends and buybacks.
  • Consolidation: The "Shale Game" is now dominated by a few "behemoths" with massive balance sheets, specifically ExxonMobil (XOM) and Chevron (CVX).
  • Efficiency Gains: Technological ingenuity has drastically reduced drilling times. A lateral well that took 25–35 days to drill in 2015 can now be completed in under 10 days, allowing producers to "do more with less" even as rig counts trend sideways.

Takeaways

  • Monitor the "Sweet Spot": The industry views $70–$75 per barrel as the ideal price equilibrium. Prices above $80–$90 risk "demand destruction," while prices below $60 squeeze margins for smaller players.
  • Watch the 6-Month Lag: Even if oil prices spike, there is a 4 to 6-month delay before new supply hits the market due to the logistics of mobilizing rigs and crews.
  • Focus on Large-Cap Stability: For general investors, the consolidation trend favors mega-caps like XOM and CVX which have the scale to manage rising service costs and infrastructure needs.

Oil Service Providers & Input Costs

Investment in the oil sector is currently facing "service inflation." When the price of oil rises, the companies providing the tools, chemicals, and labor immediately raise their rates, capturing a portion of the producers' increased profits.

  • Sticky Inflation: While service providers (rig operators, chemical suppliers) are quick to raise prices when oil hits $100, they are slow to lower them when oil drops back to $70.
  • Key Cost Drivers:
    • Labor: Personnel costs have risen 25–30% over the last five years and are difficult to reverse.
    • Steel & Aluminum: Tariffs have materially impacted the cost of "casing" and tubing for wells.
    • Electricity: High power costs are a major burden for "conventional" wells that need to pump large volumes of water.

Takeaways

  • Margin Squeeze Risk: Investors should be cautious of smaller independent producers during price volatility, as their operating expenses (OPEX) are rising faster than their revenue during short-term price spikes.
  • Service Sector Power: Companies providing specialized chemicals (like xylene) and workover rigs hold significant pricing power over producers.

Conventional vs. Unconventional (Shale) Assets

The transcript highlights a distinction between "Shale" (unconventional) and "Conventional" oil reservoirs. While shale gets the headlines, conventional assets remain a steady, albeit older, part of the U.S. energy mix.

  • Conventional Reservoirs: These are "easier" rocks (higher porosity) found 70–100 years ago (e.g., assets in Alaska's North Slope). They are often "under-capitalized" and ignored by big players.
  • Unconventional (Shale): Requires horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing. This is capital-intensive and now requires massive scale to be profitable.

Takeaways

  • Niche Opportunities: Small, independent companies (like Sienna Natural Resources) find value in "rounding error" assets discarded by majors.
  • Inventory Concerns: There is an estimated 5 to 10 years of "core" economic inventory left in the Permian Basin, depending on the price of oil. As this "Tier 1" acreage is exhausted, the cost of production will likely rise.

Geopolitical & Regulatory Themes

The "American Oil Man" sentiment is currently caught between political crosscurrents.

  • The "Democratic Paradox": The industry often sees higher prices (and thus higher profits) during Democratic administrations due to tighter regulation restricting supply, even though the rhetoric is "anti-industry."
  • Geopolitical Volatility: Markets are highly sensitive to headlines regarding the Strait of Hormuz and Middle East tensions. However, the U.S. is increasingly insulated due to its status as a net exporter of "Light Sweet" crude.
  • Refining Mismatch: A persistent issue for the U.S. is that its refineries were built decades ago for heavy offshore oil, while U.S. fields now produce "light sweet" crude, necessitating continued imports/exports to balance the "blend."

Takeaways

  • Political Hedging: Investors should ignore "drill, baby, drill" or "anti-oil" rhetoric and focus on WTI (West Texas Intermediate) price stability.
  • Energy Independence: The U.S. shale revolution has fundamentally changed global risk by preventing the "resource scarcity" that led to previous 20th-century conflicts.
Ask about this postAnswers are grounded in this post's content.
Episode Description
The White House wants gasoline prices to be lower, and it wants to see American oil companies drill for more oil. But of course, these ideas are in tension. If prices are going lower, why drill more? This tension has only grown sharper since the shale busts of the mid-2010s, as American producers got burned multiple times by prioritizing production over profits. So what now? How do US producers think about the recent oil price spike? How are they thinking about the rising costs of their own production, due to higher energy, labor, and steel costs? On this episode, we speak with Jack McClendon, the founder and CEO of Siena Natural Resources, an independent oil and gas company that primary buys odd lots of wells from other companies. We talk about the long-term economics of the industry, including the central role of capital markets in determining how the industry moves. He also tells us whether the show Landman is realistic. Read more: Oil Tankers Hauling US Crude Via Panama Approaching 4-Year High The US Oil Industry Doesn’t Want the Iran War Either Only http://Bloomberg.com subscribers can get the Odd Lots newsletter in their inbox each week, plus unlimited access to the site and app. Subscribe at  bloomberg.com/subscriptions/oddlots Subscribe to the Odd Lots Newsletter Join the conversation: discord.gg/oddlots See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
About Odd Lots
Odd Lots

Odd Lots

By Bloomberg

<p>Bloomberg's Joe Weisenthal and Tracy Alloway explore the most interesting topics in finance, markets and economics. Join the conversation every Monday and Thursday.</p>