Alex Imas on Why Economists Might Be Getting AI Wrong
Alex Imas on Why Economists Might Be Getting AI Wrong
21 days agoOdd LotsBloomberg
Podcast47 min 2 sec
Listen to Episode
Note: AI-generated summary based on third-party content. Not financial advice. Read more.
Quick Insights

Investors should prioritize exposure to companies leading the shift toward "agentic" AI, such as Anthropic (Claude) and OpenAI, which are moving beyond simple chat to autonomous workflow execution. Focus on sectors with high data density and verifiable outputs like Software Engineering, Accounting, and Legal Discovery, as these industries are poised for the most immediate productivity gains. To hedge against potential labor displacement, maintain a diversified core position in the S&P 500 or total market ETFs, ensuring you capture the productivity wealth accruing to capital owners rather than laborers. Consider a long-term overweight position in Healthcare and Longevity sectors, as human time and wellness will become the ultimate scarce resources in an era of cheap cognitive labor. Monitor Meta (META) for its integration of social data into AI models, which positions the firm to capture the growing "human premium" and social-centric branding.

Detailed Analysis

Artificial Intelligence (AI) & Large Language Models (LLMs)

The discussion centered on the shift from specific, purpose-built AI (like AlphaGo) to General Purpose Technology (GPT). The core insight is that AI is moving from a tool that "tells you things" to "agents" that can "do things" autonomously on a computer.

  • General Intelligence vs. Specific Tools: The "G" in GPT stands for generality. Unlike previous iterations, current LLMs can perform a wide array of cognitive tasks (writing, accounting, forecasting) rather than just one specialized function.
  • The Rise of Agents: The "paradigm shift" occurs when AI moves from a web browser interface to an agentic model—software that can use your computer's tools to execute tasks (e.g., creating and filling a spreadsheet) rather than just explaining how to do it.
  • Verifiable Tasks: AI currently excels at tasks where the output is easily verifiable, such as mathematics, coding, and data processing.

Takeaways

  • Monitor "Agentic" Capabilities: Investors should look for companies integrating "agents" (like Claude Code or OpenAI's latest releases) that move beyond chat interfaces into workflow execution.
  • Focus on Verifiable Sectors: Industries with high data density and verifiable outputs (Software Engineering, Accounting, Legal Discovery) are the first in line for massive productivity shifts.

Software Engineering & Coding

The podcast highlights a debate regarding whether AI will lead to a "white-collar wipeout" or a hiring boom in the tech sector.

  • Elasticity of Demand: If AI makes coding 10x faster, will companies fire 90% of engineers, or will they build 10x more software? Historically, tech has shown "elastic demand," meaning lower costs lead to significantly higher consumption/production.
  • Vibe Coding: A new trend where humans focus on the "vibe" or high-level architecture while AI handles the syntax and drudgery.

Takeaways

  • Bullish Case: If software demand remains elastic, AI will be a massive tailwind for the tech sector, allowing for more complex products to be built at lower costs.
  • Bearish Case: If the market for software becomes "satiated," we may see significant downsizing in entry-level and mid-level engineering roles.

The Labor Market & "At-Risk" Sectors

Economists use a "task-based model" to evaluate job risk. A job is not one thing; it is a collection of tasks.

  • Complementarity vs. Substitution: If AI automates a "meaningless" task (like data entry), the human becomes more valuable in their remaining tasks (like strategy). However, if tasks are "interrelated" (like an O-ring), failing one part (even if AI does the rest) ruins the whole job.
  • High-Risk Sectors:
    • Trucking & Warehousing: While often viewed as physical, these are becoming highly automated "closed loops." If a warehouse is 100% automated, the incentive to automate the truck that docks there increases exponentially.
    • One-Dimensional Roles: Jobs with fewer varied tasks are easier for firms to justify the high capital expenditure of automation.
  • The "Human" Premium: As AI commoditizes cognitive labor, "performative humanity"—social skills, charisma, personal branding, and "human touch"—becomes the scarce, high-value resource.

Takeaways

  • Investment Theme: Healthcare & Longevity: As goods and cognitive services become cheap and abundant, Time becomes the ultimate scarce resource. Expect a long-term shift of GDP toward healthcare, wellness, and life extension.
  • Risk Factor: Speed of Transition: The primary risk is not that new jobs won't be created, but that they won't be created fast enough. Rapid automation could lead to short-term social and economic friction before new "human-centric" roles emerge.

Ownership of Capital

A significant insight from the discussion is the potential shift in how wealth is distributed if labor becomes less valuable.

  • Universal Basic Capital: If AI replaces labor, the only way for the general public to maintain purchasing power is through the ownership of capital (stocks/assets).
  • Firm Incentives: Companies have a massive incentive to invest in automation for roles that are high-paying but don't require a college degree (e.g., long-haul trucking).

Takeaways

  • Actionable Strategy: In an AI-driven economy, being a "laborer" is higher risk than being a "capital owner." Diversified exposure to the S&P 500 or total market ETFs is a hedge against labor displacement, as the productivity gains from AI will likely accrue to shareholders.

Mentioned Entities & Tickers

  • OpenAI: Mentioned as the leader in the space, specifically their investment in "charismatic" human talent (TBP).
  • Anthropic (Claude): Cited for "Claude Code" as a major step toward agentic AI.
  • Meta (META): Discussed regarding their AI's social data integration and "Mecha Hitler" (Tay/early AI) historical comparisons.
  • Fidelity / Chase / Public.com: Mentioned in sponsorship context regarding low-cost entry to markets and AI-generated indices.
Ask about this postAnswers are grounded in this post's content.
Episode Description
Everyone knows that new technologies can be really disruptive to the labor market, but eventually new jobs emerge and things come back into balance. And there is a sense in which many view AI with the same lens. Yes, there will be pain in some sectors, but then there will be productivity gains and new sources of demand and new opportunities for labor that we can't conceive of yet. But could it be different this time? Could AI be disruptive in a manner that, say, the steam engine was not? On this episode we speak with Alex Imas, a professor at the University of Chicago focusing on economics and applied AI. We talk about his work on the AI and labor question, how to think about which jobs may be most at risk, and why the sheer speed of AI development could make it categorically different than prior general purpose technologies that came before it. Subscribe to the Odd Lots Newsletter Join the conversation: discord.gg/oddlots See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
About Odd Lots
Odd Lots

Odd Lots

By Bloomberg

<p>Bloomberg's Joe Weisenthal and Tracy Alloway explore the most interesting topics in finance, markets and economics. Join the conversation every Monday and Thursday.</p>