Supersonic Tsunami Hits SaaS: My Turbulence Model Is Flashing Risk
Supersonic Tsunami Hits SaaS: My Turbulence Model Is Flashing Risk
YouTube1 hr 4 min
Watch on YouTube
Note: AI-generated summary based on third-party content. Not financial advice. Read more.
Quick Insights

Consider rotating out of the SaaS software sector (IGV), which is viewed as a "value trap" facing significant disruption from Artificial Intelligence. Instead, focus on the "physical world" scarcity theme by investing in companies supplying the AI build-out, such as Chevron (CVX) in energy and Eaton (ETN) in capital goods. Increase your allocation to international stocks (MSCI World ex-US), as this index is breaking out of a 15-year flat period and provides a hedge against US tech concentration. For emerging markets exposure, consider Brazil (EWZ), which is benefiting from rising commodity prices and falling interest rates. Long-term investors should view a potential drop in Bitcoin (BTC) towards the $40,000 level as a strategic buying opportunity.

Detailed Analysis

SaaS / Software Sector (IGV)

  • The speaker is extremely bearish on the Software as a Service (SaaS) sector, calling it a "value trap" and warning investors against trying to "pick the bottom."
  • The core thesis is that the "supersonic tsunami" of Artificial Intelligence is creating a "demand destruction cycle" for traditional software.
  • AI is making coding "ubiquitous and effectively free," leading to a "supply explosion" where 10 times more software companies will emerge, chasing the same customers.
  • This increased competition will lead to compressed margins, lower prices, and more difficult customer acquisition for incumbent software companies.
  • The speaker notes that while software earnings are currently at all-time highs, this does not account for the coming disruption. He states, "I have no idea which software companies are going to be needed" in three years.
  • He specifically mentions the IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) as a representation of the sector and highlights the large retail inflows into it, suggesting it may be a crowded trade on the wrong side.

Takeaways

  • Avoid or reduce exposure to the general SaaS sector. The speaker believes the sector is facing a structural, long-term headwind from AI-driven disruption, not a temporary cyclical downturn.
  • Buying the dip in beaten-down software stocks is considered a high-risk strategy that could lead to significant losses, as these companies may become "value traps" that go sideways or continue to fall.
  • The disruption is not about a lack of demand for software, but an explosion in supply, which will destroy the "scarcity premium" that software companies have historically enjoyed.

Hyperscalers (MAG-7, MSFT, AMZN, GOOGL, META)

  • The speaker is increasingly bearish on the hyperscalers (Microsoft, Amazon, Google, Meta), arguing that the market's belief that they will be the guaranteed winners of the AI race is flawed.
  • These companies are transitioning from asset-light to asset-heavy businesses as they are forced to spend hundreds of billions on physical infrastructure like data centers, transformers, and cooling systems.
  • This massive capital expenditure (CapEx) creates new risks:
    • They are colliding with the "physical world and its constraints," leading to growing bottlenecks and delays in data center build-outs.
    • They face "existential risk": overbuilding leads to bankruptcy risk, while underbuilding means losing their competitive position.
    • Increased spending means less cash available for shareholder returns like buybacks.
  • Competition is intensifying rapidly from both private companies (Anthropic) and cheaper, open-source Chinese AI models. The speaker notes that entrepreneurs and startups will naturally gravitate toward these lower-cost solutions.
  • Microsoft (MSFT) is highlighted as a specific concern. The speaker shows a chart of MSFT relative to the S&P 500, calling it a "waterfall chart" and noting it has erased all its outperformance since ChatGPT was launched. He questions the value of products like Copilot when cheaper, more flexible alternatives exist.

Takeaways

  • Re-evaluate large allocations to hyperscalers. The idea that their size guarantees they will win the AI war is being challenged. They face significant execution risk, margin pressure from high CapEx, and intensifying competition.
  • Consider being underweight the four main hyperscalers (MSFT, AMZN, GOOGL, META) as a way to fund investments in other areas.
  • The combination of massive spending, increasing competition, and the potential for more share supply from future IPOs (xAI, Anthropic) creates a negative backdrop for the sector.

Bitcoin (BTC)

  • The speaker is long-term bullish on Bitcoin but warns of short-term downside risk.
  • Bitcoin's price has historically been correlated with the software sector. If the software sector has another major leg down, Bitcoin could "absolutely head down to 40,000."
  • However, he believes this correlation will eventually break. The long-term bull case for Bitcoin is tied to the same "supersonic tsunami" theme.
  • As AI agents become the primary consumers and the current capital structure is disrupted, Bitcoin and the crypto ecosystem will provide the necessary new framework.
  • He views the current weakness as the "last opportunity" for investors who have not yet gotten involved in crypto.
  • Once the software sector finds a bottom, he expects Bitcoin to outperform significantly and head "towards the high" before the end of the year.

Takeaways

  • For long-term investors, any significant dip in Bitcoin's price, potentially down to the $40,000 level, could represent a strategic buying opportunity.
  • Bitcoin is positioned as a hedge against the disruption of traditional enterprise companies and a play on the future "AI agent" economy.
  • The speaker believes capital that has flowed into venture capital and private equity over the last decade should now be flowing into Bitcoin.

Physical World / Scarcity Assets

  • This is the speaker's primary bullish theme. The core idea is to invest in the scarce, physical things needed to build out the AI revolution, as opposed to the abundant, digital products (like software) that AI creates.
  • He recommends a portfolio rotation: Be long scarcity, be short abundance.
  • This theme includes several sectors and specific companies:
    • Energy: The massive energy needs of data centers will benefit energy companies. Chevron (CVX) is mentioned as a stock that is about to break out after a decade of going nowhere.
    • Capital Goods / Infrastructure: Companies that build the "picks and shovels" of the AI build-out are attractive. Eaton (ETN) is highlighted as a diversified company that is breaking out of a multi-year base and benefits from multiple AI-related revenue streams. Corning (GLW) is mentioned in the context of its deal with Meta for optical fiber.
    • Materials & Chemicals: The build-out requires vast amounts of raw materials. The speaker mentions copper, silver, and is beginning to research the chemicals sector. He gives Celanese (CE) as a "freebie" to look at, noting its recent price increases.

Takeaways

  • Shift investment focus towards "asset-heavy" industries that supply the physical components for the AI infrastructure boom. This includes energy, utilities, industrial materials, and capital goods.
  • Look for companies in these sectors that are breaking out of long-term consolidation patterns, as this could signal the beginning of a major rotation of capital.
  • These sectors are seen as having a "moat" against AI disruption because they operate in the physical world, which AI cannot easily replicate.

Investment Theme: Small Caps vs. Large-Cap Tech (IWM vs. QQQ)

  • The speaker is bullish on the Russell 2000 (IWM) relative to the Nasdaq 100 (QQQ).
  • This trade is presented as a "gift that keeps on giving" and a primary way to express the theme of rotating out of over-owned, AI-disrupted large-cap tech and into other areas of the economy.
  • He believes that as capital expenditure for the AI build-out accelerates, it will lift smaller, more cyclically-sensitive companies, causing small caps to outperform.
  • He warns that many hedge funds use the Russell 2000 as a hedge against their long software positions, and if this trade unwinds, it could cause significant outperformance for IWM.

Takeaways

  • Consider a pair trade of being long IWM and short QQQ to hedge against a potential downturn in large-cap technology stocks while capturing upside from a broadening market.
  • Avoid being short small-cap stocks, as this has been a crowded hedge that could unwind violently.

Investment Theme: Semiconductors vs. Software (SMH vs. IGV)

  • The speaker is bullish on semiconductors (SMH) relative to software (IGV).
  • This is a direct application of his "scarcity vs. abundance" thesis. Semiconductors are the scarce "picks and shovels" needed for AI, while software is becoming an abundant commodity.
  • He notes that this trade has worked very well, with semiconductors continuing to move away from software.
  • Within the semiconductor space, he prefers analog names.
  • NVIDIA (NVDA) is still considered one of the best places to be within the Mag 7, alongside Tesla, due to its critical role in AI compute.

Takeaways

  • Favor investments in the semiconductor sector over the software sector.
  • A potential pair trade is to be long the SMH ETF and short the IGV ETF.
  • Despite broader concerns about tech, key enablers like NVIDIA are still viewed favorably.

Palantir (PLTR)

  • Palantir is mentioned as a notable exception to the broad bearish thesis on software.
  • The speaker believes Palantir (PLTR) could get a bounce.
  • He groups it with cybersecurity software names as a place investors "need to be."

Takeaways

  • While the overall software sector is viewed negatively, specific companies with unique positioning in critical areas like government and enterprise AI platforms (Palantir) or cybersecurity may be attractive.
  • This suggests a more nuanced approach is needed, focusing on best-in-class names rather than buying the entire sector.

International Stocks (MSCI World ex-US)

  • The speaker is extremely bullish on international stocks, particularly MSCI World ex-US.
  • He highlights a chart showing this index has been flat for nearly 15 years (from 2007 to 2024) and is now starting to accelerate higher.
  • An investment in foreign stocks is seen as an "embedded put" or hedge against the US-centric tech disruption thesis.
  • If there is a deleveraging event in the US market focused on tech, it could lead to a weaker US dollar and repatriation of capital out of the US, benefiting international markets.

Takeaways

  • Increase allocation to international equities. The MSCI World ex-US index is breaking out of a 15-year base, suggesting a major long-term shift in market leadership may be underway.
  • This is a way to diversify away from the concentration risk in the US market, which is heavily weighted towards the tech and hyperscaler names the speaker is bearish on.

Brazil (EWZ)

  • The speaker is very bullish on Brazil, represented by the EWZ ETF.
  • The investment case is based on a favorable macroeconomic setup:
    • A rising CRB Raw Industrials Index, indicating strong commodity demand which benefits Brazil's economy.
    • A falling Selic rate (Brazil's central bank interest rate). He notes there is a 90% probability of a rate cut in March and that Brazil has plenty of room to cut further.
  • He believes this combination of rising commodity prices and falling interest rates creates a "sweet spot" for Brazilian equities to outperform.

Takeaways

  • Consider an allocation to Brazil (EWZ) as a way to play both the "scarcity" theme (commodities) and the theme of investing in international markets with improving fundamentals.
  • The speaker dismisses political concerns, arguing that the macroeconomic drivers are the most important factor for the market's direction.

Market Outlook & Risk Factors

  • The speaker warns of a growing probability of a significant "unwind event" or "deleveraging" in the market this year, driven by hedge funds.
  • His proprietary "Turbulence Model" is flashing warning signs, indicating that the market's internal correlations are breaking down in a way that is historically associated with high risk.
  • He points to several red flags:
    • Hedge fund gross leverage is near all-time highs.
    • Credit markets are weakening (HYG is trending lower, junk spreads are widening).
    • 10-year Treasury rates are falling despite strong economic data, suggesting the bond market is sensing a larger risk.
    • Market leadership is shifting to defensive sectors like staples and utilities, which is historically an "unhealthy" sign.
  • The core risk is that the AI disruption is causing idiosyncratic shocks across many different stocks and sectors simultaneously, breaking the statistical models that highly-levered quantitative and multi-strategy hedge funds rely on.

Takeaways

  • Be prepared for increased market volatility and the potential for a sharp, rapid deleveraging event.
  • The speaker suggests it may be prudent to "own vol" (volatility) as a hedge against this risk.
  • Pay close attention to cross-asset signals, particularly from the credit markets (HYG, junk spreads) and Treasury yields, as they may provide early warnings of a broader market dislocation.
Ask about this postAnswers are grounded in this post's content.
Video Description
In this week's video, I break down why we are now in the midst of what Elon Musk called the "supersonic tsunami", and why the acceleration phase of AI is rewriting market structure in real time. Over the past week, the disruption spread beyond SaaS into insurance brokers, wealth management platforms, commercial real estate services, and trucking stocks. 115 S&P 500 names fell at least 7% over a rolling 8-day window, many near 52-week highs, a dispersion pattern we haven't seen since the dot-com rotation in 2000. The critical development: recursive self-improvement is no longer theoretical. OpenAI's GPT 5.3 Codex helped build itself, and Claude Opus 4.6 shipped with a 5x context window expansion over 4.5 just weeks prior. Meanwhile, free Chinese models like MiniMax M2.5 are benchmarking near Opus 4.6 at 1/20th the cost. The model velocity war is accelerating the deflationary spiral in anything built on code, while the hyperscalers face a trap, rising RPOs they can't fulfill due to physical bottlenecks, growing capex guidance, and competitive erosion from open-source alternatives. My turbulence model has fired 12–15 signals in five weeks versus 20–25 in the prior 28 months, and it's happening while hedge fund gross leverage sits near all-time highs. Credit is showing signs of weakening, leveraged loans have broken below the 100-day moving average, HY-to-IEF is trending lower, and BDC indices remain depressed. The covariance matrix is under stress across assets, not just equities. I believe the probability of a meaningful unwind event is closer to 25% while the market positioning suggest much lower. The positioning: be long scarcity, short abundance. That means energy, materials, chemicals, small caps, foreign stocks (particularly Brazil), and Bitcoin once software stabilizes. Names like Eaton and Chevron are breaking out of multi-year bases as PMIs just posted their biggest upswing outside of COVID. The IWM-vs-QQQ trade remains the key expression. Software isn't dead, it's worse: the cost of building a $20–100M ARR SaaS product has fallen below $10,000 in compute, creating a supply explosion that compresses margins for incumbents. The hyperscalers relative to the S&P are approaching their lowest levels since 2023. Timestamps • (00:00–03:20) Supersonic tsunami: AI has entered acceleration with recursive self-improvement confirmed. Paywall launch, why software becomes a value trap, and why crypto’s utility grows as AI agents become consumers. • (03:38–06:30) Structural disruption: This isn’t rotation — AI is cannibalizing prior winners. Insurance brokers, wealth management, CRE, and trucking hit in a week ($250B wiped by a $1.5B startup). • (06:30–09:00) Dot-com parallels: 115 S&P names fell 7%+ in 8 days near highs. Turbulence model stress rising. Hedge fund gross leverage at extremes; pod shops de-risking. • (09:00–12:25) Systemic risk: Gross leverage matters more than net. IWM vs QQQ critical. Rotation into small caps/materials creates size mismatch pressure. • (13:06–14:34) SaaS value trap: Software now 5th most expensive sector. “Buying cheap” ignores exponential AI deflation — coding cost collapsing. • (14:34–18:26) Recursive self-improvement: Opus 4.5 → 4.6 in weeks. GPT Codex building infrastructure for AI. Shift from AI assisting humans to AI building for AI. • (18:43–21:58) Model velocity war: Chinese models matching frontier at lower cost. Open-source agents + cheap hardware = digital labor explosion. K-shaped economy drives free-model adoption. • (23:16–25:26) Jaws of disruption: No moats safe. Breakdowns from highs signal momentum failure. Crowding + AI disruption = new unmodeled risk factor. • (26:08–29:16) Macro signals: Rates falling despite strong nominal GDP. Wage pressure easing. True core inflation lower than reported. S&P struggling as largest names weaken. • (29:16–34:45) The trade: Long scarcity (IWM, energy, materials, chemicals), short abundance (QQQ, software, hyperscalers). SaaS supply exploding; scarcity premium collapsing. • (35:01–41:13) Hyperscaler trap: RPOs rising but capacity constrained. Capex surging. Chinese competition growing. Share shifts accelerating. “Software guys becoming hardware guys.” • (41:35–44:57) Physical bottlenecks: Power, transformers, copper, fiber, HBM — any delay revenue. Data center cancellations rising. Overbuild vs underbuild dilemma. • (46:40–53:47) Risk framework: Turbulence rising across credit, HY, BDCs. Financials weakening. Leadership shifting defensively. Deleveraging risk increasing. • (53:47–59:22) Positioning: Long ex-US (MSCI World ex-US), Brazil (falling rates + industrial upswing), energy and industrial breakouts. Chemicals emerging theme. • (59:22–1:04:40) Bitcoin: Correlated with software but lower downside beta. If software waterfalls, BTC could retest lower levels before Fed cuts and dollar weakness set up next leg. Creative destruction favors scarcity.
About Jordi Visser
Jordi Visser

Jordi Visser

By @jordivisserlabs

Empowering seasoned professionals to navigate the future of finance, technology, and AI. What We Offer: - Cutting-edge ...