👋 JOIN THE FAMILY: http://www.patreon.com/investanswers
📈 IA MODELS: https://investanswers.io/indicators
🏖️ IA RETIREMENT TOOLS: https://investanswers.io/retirement-tools
🧠 FREE INVESTOR QUIZ: https://investor-profiler.investanswers.io
📬 IA NEWSLETTER: https://investanswers.substack.com
🪙 IA CRYPTO COMPENDIUM:
http://investanswers.io/crypto-compendium
⚙️ IA SCP Profiler: http://investanswers.io/scp-profiler
🌐 TradingView Referral: https://www.tradingview.com/?aff_id=27663
DISCLAIMER: InvestAnswers does not provide financial, investment, tax, or legal advice. None of the content on the InvestAnswers channels is financial, investment, tax, or legal advice and should not be taken as such; the content is intended only for educational and entertainment purposes. InvestAnswers (James) shares some of his trades as learning examples but they are only relevant to his specific portfolio allocation, risk tolerance & financial expertise, may not constitute a comprehensive or complete discussion of such topics, and should not be emulated. The content of this video is solely the opinion(s) of the speaker who is not a licensed financial advisor or registered investment advisor. Trading equities or cryptocurrencies poses considerable risk of loss. Kindly use your judgment and do your own research at all times. You are solely responsible for your own financial, investing, and trading decisions.
00:00 Introduction
00:59 When Bitcoin’s price drops below what it costs to mine profitably, a lot of miners shut down their rigs — hash rate falls and blocks slow down until the next difficulty adjustment kicks in. My question is: does that drop in mining activity actually have any real effect on Bitcoin’s scarcity or supply, or is the halving schedule the only thing that truly controls issuance regardless of what miners are doing? Basically, is miner capitulation a security/profitability story, or does it touch scarcity at all?
01:50 BTC Price $64K, Cost to Mine $76K
03:39 Miner Capitulation Is Security, Not Scarcity and Hash Ribbons & Supply Dynamics Math
05:08 Watching the recent Cyber Bulls discussion there was lots of discussion about Tesla and SpaceX. Off the back of that I have a question about what we should focus on in terms of stacking; Tsla and or Spcx? Does a potential merger between the two make a difference? In other words am I wasting funds buying SpaceX if I should be focusing on Tesla - or vice versa?
06:07 TSLA or SPACEX (SPCX) for Stacking? Merger Impact?
07:15 Liquidity + Execution Edge to TSLA
07:38 Tesla Vs. SpaceX: The Liquidity & TAM Math
08:15 Tesla TAMs Are Larger Than SpaceX
09:01 IA TSLA SPCX Arb Model
10:58 Buying dips in high-conviction assets (IA13/crypto proxies) is easy, but selling gives me analysis paralysis. I trade spot stock in a tax-free wrapper (no options/no tax). In your experience, which approach is better for peace of mind and long-term gains: HOLD LONG TERM (do you need a strict macro target or do you hold indefinitely) or LAYERING OUT (LILO) (taking profits on the way up)?
Hold Long Term vs Layering Out (LILO)
13:12 IA NVDA Case
15:30 Example IA13 2030 Price Targets
17:32 The Math Destroying the LILO Strategy
18:47 Conviction Over Analysis Paralysis
20:04 I’m feeling conflicted due to disconnects with two other rules you advise. Since 2021 the CAGR on Tesla sits well short of your minimum 14% target. And while Tesla always seems to be on the precipice of something transformative - FSD, Cybercab, Optimus - none of it is generating meaningful revenue yet. So my question is: at what point does this become ‘hope as a strategy’ (second rule) if execution at scale continues to drag?
21:21 The 14% CAGR Rule
23:58 The Tesla 4 Year Cycles
24:41 Tesla TAMs Are Larger Than SpaceX
25:28 When Hope Becomes Toxic
26:39 For younger investors (I’m 25) with a long time horizon and high conviction in a hated, deeply oversold name like MSTR right now. What’s an acceptable max concentration % before it’s reckless, not brave?
27:03 Concentration Risk Vs. Asymmetric Conviction
28:09 MSTR PTs 1 Year From Now
29:07 A voice I respect, Anthony Pompliano, recently interviewed Andrew Kang, CEO of the RoboStrategy ETF which seems like an intriguing investment vehicle. Are you familiar with the fund? My questions are: (a) is it too early to expect a good ROI from such an investment, (b) how would I even begin to determine a fair share value, and (c) for exposure to the sector, would I be better off just buying more TSLA?
29:48 BOT ETF Fees
30:02 BOT ETF Holdings
30:50 The Wall Street Fee Trap: Avoid BOT ETF
31:42 Pure Play Apex Predator Vs. Diluted ETFs
33:45 Optimus Factory Scale
34:21 Helping Animals
35:00 Thoughts on exiting Amazon with 2x Gains and put in Marvel at this level?