Tough Week Ahead? My View on AI stocks, QQQ, Bitcoin, the Macro, the End of Fundamentals, Oil & Risk
Tough Week Ahead? My View on AI stocks, QQQ, Bitcoin, the Macro, the End of Fundamentals, Oil & Risk
YouTube19 min 12 sec
Watch on YouTube
Note: AI-generated summary based on third-party content. Not financial advice. Read more.
Quick Insights
  • Avoid leverage and short options, and review positions ahead of the potentially volatile week surrounding midterm results and Middle East developments.
  • Bitcoin (BTC) is the speaker’s most positive asset view, recently near $78,000, but treat a drop into the $60,000s as a possible downside scenario—not a forecast.
  • The speaker favors the AI infrastructure investment theme, citing Oracle (ORCL) and Microsoft (MSFT)’s efforts to fund expansion with cash flow; funding needs and high rates remain key risks.
  • Watch Brent crude near $118: a hypothetical rise toward $130 could intensify inflation and weigh on markets.
Detailed Analysis

NVIDIA (NVDA)

  • The speaker calls NVIDIA a sign that fundamentals and company growth have not been reflected in share prices.
    • NVIDIA was described as down about 1% over the past year, while quarterly revenue rose from $46 billion in Q2 2025 to $96 billion in Q2 2026. The speaker also said profitability had increased.
  • The speaker views the stock as part of a broader market that has seen a year of multiple compression.

Takeaways

  • The speaker’s view is bullish on NVIDIA’s business growth relative to its share-price performance, but the transcript does not give a price target or a specific buy recommendation.
  • The broader risk is that strong company results may not translate into near-term share-price gains while macro conditions and market sentiment remain dominant.

Nasdaq / QQQ

  • The speaker said the Nasdaq returned 9.7% over the past year, compared with a 20.23% average annual return over the prior 10 years, and characterized recent performance as weak relative to that history.
  • The episode title mentions QQQ, but the transcript discusses the Nasdaq rather than QQQ specifically; it does not provide a separate QQQ performance figure or recommendation.
  • The speaker says innovation-focused stocks have been falling, even as some more defensive S&P 500 holdings, including Coca-Cola and Costco, helped keep the S&P 500 relatively steady.

Takeaways

  • The speaker sees potential for a rebound in oversold growth and innovation stocks, but emphasizes uncertainty around upcoming political and geopolitical events.
  • Investors considering Nasdaq exposure should account for the possibility that growth stocks could remain under pressure even if the broader market appears stable.

Hims & Hers (HIMS)

  • Hims & Hers was presented as an example of the speaker’s claim that fundamentals are not driving prices reliably: the stock reportedly fell 10% after a CEO announcement that investors had been waiting for.

Takeaways

  • The example highlights the risk of assuming that anticipated company news will lead to a positive share-price reaction.
  • The speaker considers individual stocks broadly oversold, but gives no specific recommendation or price target for Hims & Hers.

Tesla (TSLA) and SpaceX

  • The speaker said anti-business, anti-AI, or anti-Elon Musk sentiment could affect Elon Musk-related companies, including Tesla and SpaceX.
  • The speaker framed this as a possible consequence of political developments and calls for investigations, not as a certainty.
  • SpaceX is a private company, so it is not directly available to public-market investors as a listed stock.

Takeaways

  • The discussion points to political and reputational sentiment as potential risks for Tesla and other Musk-related businesses.
  • The transcript does not make a direct investment recommendation for either company.

Oracle (ORCL), Microsoft (MSFT), and CoreWeave

  • The speaker argues that AI companies may continue attracting capital despite high interest rates because they can offer investors attractive yields and growth prospects.
  • Oracle reportedly indicated it could move toward cash-flow-positive funding within roughly a year and a half, after which the speaker said its credit-default-swap rates fell.
  • Microsoft was described as improving its funding outlook by saying it would finance much of its AI expansion with cash flow.
  • CoreWeave’s credit-default-swap rates were said to have eased somewhat.

Takeaways

  • The speaker’s thesis is relatively bullish on the ability of large AI-related companies to fund continued investment, even with borrowing costs elevated.
  • Funding conditions remain a key risk: the transcript discusses credit-market measures and financing concerns but does not provide company-specific price targets.

Alphabet (GOOGL) and Intel (INTC)

  • The speaker used these companies to argue that large corporations can experience sharp share-price moves:
    • Alphabet was described as falling 21% over two days.
    • Intel was described as losing about a third of its value in roughly an hour, after previously being valued at around $500 billion.
  • These examples were contrasted with Bitcoin to suggest that corporate and financing risks can make individual stocks vulnerable to sudden shocks.

Takeaways

  • The examples underline the risk of concentrated exposure to individual companies, including large, established firms.
  • The speaker does not offer a specific outlook or recommendation for Alphabet or Intel.

Strategy (MSTR) and iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT)

  • The speaker said Strategy was down about 7%, less than some innovation stocks mentioned in the episode.
  • IBIT was used as a proxy for Bitcoin’s price history when discussing a possible decline from the mid-$80,000s to the low-$60,000s over about a month. This was presented as a hypothetical scenario, not a forecast.

Takeaways

  • Strategy and IBIT may provide indirect exposure to Bitcoin, but the transcript does not discuss their distinct risks or give specific recommendations.
  • The speaker’s comparison is intended to highlight relative market moves; it does not establish that these products will track Bitcoin’s future performance in the same way.

Bitcoin (BTC)

  • The speaker was comparatively positive about Bitcoin’s resilience amid a difficult macro backdrop, noting it was near $78,000 and only about $3,000–$4,000 below the prior week’s level.
  • Bitcoin was described as up 29% over four months. The speaker suggested it had held up better than some large company stocks and may be less exposed to corporate financing or business-model disruption.
  • A return to the $60,000s was discussed as a possible downside scenario that could take about a month, based on a previous move tracked using IBIT. The speaker did not present this as a prediction.
  • The speaker speculated that Bitcoin could benefit if renewed quantitative easing (QE) were eventually used to support government debt and real estate. This is a conditional thesis, not a stated policy expectation.

Takeaways

  • The speaker is relatively bullish on Bitcoin’s resilience and potential benefit from future money creation, while acknowledging the possibility of a substantial decline.
  • The transcript gives no firm price target or timeline for further gains. Treat the $60,000s scenario and possible QE benefit as conditional discussion, not a forecast.

Brent Crude Oil

  • Brent was cited at $117.70, near a recent high of $118.03. The speaker said oil had nearly tripled compared with two years earlier.
  • The speaker warned that a renewed Middle East conflict could push oil toward a hypothetical $130, worsening inflation and potentially increasing the odds of a rate hike.
  • Winter energy demand was cited as a factor that could make high oil prices more consequential.

Takeaways

  • Oil is a key macro risk in the speaker’s outlook: a further rise could feed inflation and weigh on markets.
  • The $130 level was an illustration of a possible scenario, not a price target or forecast.

AI and the AI Infrastructure Build-Out

  • The speaker’s central investment theme is that AI companies may win a competition for capital against real estate and government borrowing.
  • The speaker believes AI companies can better afford elevated borrowing costs and that investor funding may continue flowing toward AI infrastructure.
  • The speaker also said fears about AI funding had eased, citing cash-flow plans from Oracle and Microsoft and Anthropic’s reported cash resources.
  • Anthropic is a private company; the transcript discusses its funding position rather than a publicly traded investment.

Takeaways

  • The speaker’s thesis favors the AI sector as a destination for capital, but it depends on continued investment demand and companies’ ability to finance expansion.
  • Elevated rates and funding needs remain relevant risks; the transcript does not establish that AI companies are insulated from them.

Real Estate, Bonds, and Interest Rates

  • The speaker described real estate as being in significant distress and noted that it is the largest asset class, followed by bonds and then stocks.
  • The speaker believes high rates driven partly by AI-related borrowing could divert capital away from real estate and government funding.
  • The speaker suggested the Federal Reserve might eventually resume QE—potentially by buying government and mortgage debt—to support those areas if this pressure continues. The transcript presents this as a thesis, not a confirmed policy path.
  • The speaker also argued that long-term market rates increasingly matter more than the Fed’s short-term rate decisions.

Takeaways

  • The outlook is conditional: persistent high rates could pressure real estate and government financing, while any return to QE could change that picture.
  • Investors should note the speaker’s stated uncertainty about Fed policy and interest-rate direction; no specific rate forecast is provided.

Market Risk, Options, and Leverage

  • The speaker expects a potentially difficult week, with uncertainty around midterm results and the possibility of renewed Middle East conflict afterward.
  • The speaker said Monday and Tuesday could be a time to prepare for possible volatility, while emphasizing that the direction of the market is unknown.
  • The speaker explicitly advised avoiding short options and leverage, and suggested investors with too much leverage or options exposure consider preparing for adverse news.
  • The speaker also noted that midterm outcomes and geopolitical events could affect individual stocks differently from the broader market.

Takeaways

  • The clearest practical guidance in the discussion is to be cautious with leverage and short options during a volatile, event-driven period.
  • The speaker raises de-risking or reviewing positions as possibilities, but does not give a universal instruction to sell or make a specific portfolio recommendation.

Ask about this postAnswers are grounded in this post's content.
Video Description
Join Patreon for Exclusive Perks: https://www.patreon.com/btdenominator Beat The Denominator is a channel whose goal is to Beat the dollar's inflation (i.e., beat the denominator). Therefore, I don't cover just inexpensive stocks: I also cover my expectations for the difficult week ahead that the entire internet is warning us about. I go over why I think stocks are undervalued, and what may happen after the midtemrs regarding oil, the midterms, the Fed, interest rates, Real estate, AI stocks like NVDA, the QQQ the nasdaq, and lastly Bitcoin. The Macro continues to be disappointing. No Financial Advice! As always, this video is NOT investment advice, and none of the contents should be construed as such. I do not make short-term or long-term price predictions for any stock investment, and all words spoken in this video are for entertainment purposes ONLY.
About Beat The Denominator
Beat The Denominator

Beat The Denominator

By @BeatTheDenominator